Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.7K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.7K
Position-effect Variegation02:32

Position-effect Variegation

7.1K
In 1928, a German botanist Emil Heitz observed the moss nuclei with a DNA binding dye. He observed that while some chromatin regions decondense and spread out in the interphase nucleus, others do not. He termed them euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. He proposed that the heterochromatin regions reflect a functionally inactive state of the genome. It was later confirmed that heterochromatin is transcriptionally repressed, and euchromatin is transcriptionally active chromatin.
7.1K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.3K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.3K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

1.2K
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.2K
What is Natural Selection?01:32

What is Natural Selection?

129.8K
Natural selection is an evolutionary process in which individuals with survival-promoting traits reproduce at higher rates. These favorable traits become more common within a population or species. Naturally selected traits initially arise via random genetic mutations. In order for selection to occur, there must be variation within a population, the trait controlling the variation must be heritable, and there must be an evolutionary advantage for variation in the trait.
129.8K
Serial Position Effect01:03

Serial Position Effect

563
The serial position effect is a cognitive phenomenon where individuals are more likely to recall the first and last items in a list compared to those in the middle. This effect is divided into the primacy effect and the recency effect. The primacy effect is observed when the initial items in a list are remembered better. This occurs because these items are rehearsed more frequently or receive more elaborative processing, allowing them to be encoded into long-term memory more effectively. For...
563

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Structural Cardiac Abnormalities, Ventricular Dysfunction Phenotypes, and Heart Failure Risk among Antiretroviral Therapy-treated People Living with HIV in South Africa.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same authorSame journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Associations of urinary incontinence, absorbent product use, and confidence gained from absorbent product use with perceived ageism in later adulthood.

The Gerontologist·2026
Same author

Long-Term Glycemic Control and Pharmacotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Descriptive Analysis of 10-Year Trends in a Statewide Sample.

Journal of diabetes research·2026
Same author

Mortality Following Atypical Femoral Fractures in Men.

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research·2026
Same author

The Effect of COVID-19 on Incident Diabetes in Pediatric Patients: Findings From the National COVID-19 Cohort Collaborative (N3C).

Pediatric diabetes·2025
Same journal

Acknowledgment of Referees 2025.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
関連記事をすべて見る

関連する実験動画

Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Examination of Thymic Positive and Negative Selection by Flow Cytometry
14:29

Examination of Thymic Positive and Negative Selection by Flow Cytometry

Published on: October 8, 2012

22.7K

ポジティビティ違反下での因果推定量選択のためのフレームワーク

Martha Barnard1, Jared D Huling1, Julian Wolfson1

  • 1Division of Biostatistics & Health Data Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States.

Biometrics
|February 11, 2026
PubMed
まとめ
この要約は機械生成です。

共変量の不均衡とオーバーラップの制限により、観察データから因果効果を推定することは困難です。この研究では、正確な健康政策分析のために、統計的バイアスとターゲット集団の選択のバランスをとるフレームワークを導入します。

キーワード:
平均処置効果因果推論逆確率重み付け傾向スコアターゲット集団

さらに関連する動画

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course
11:33

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course

Published on: July 18, 2014

44.1K
Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

8.5K

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Examination of Thymic Positive and Negative Selection by Flow Cytometry
14:29

Examination of Thymic Positive and Negative Selection by Flow Cytometry

Published on: October 8, 2012

22.7K
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course
11:33

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course

Published on: July 18, 2014

44.1K
Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

8.5K

科学分野:

  • 観察研究; 因果推論; 健康政策分析

背景:

  • 処置群と対照群の間の共変量分布の不均衡およびオーバーラップの欠如により、観察データを使用した因果効果の推定は困難な課題となります。既存の逆確率重み付け(IPW)およびオーバーラップ重み付け(OW)などの手法は、統計的バイアスとバリアンスの間のトレードオフを伴い、異なるターゲット集団を対象としています。

研究 の 目的:

  • 観察データからの因果効果推定におけるバイアスとバリアンスの間のトレードオフをナビゲートするためのフレームワークを提案すること。研究者の好みに基づいて適切な因果推定量を選択するためのバイアス分解と指標を導入すること。研究者が元の研究集団の保存と統計的バイアスの削減のバランスをとるのを支援すること。

主な方法:

  • 統計的バイアスと因果推定量と標的集団の不一致を区別するためのバイアス分解フレームワークを開発しました。トレードオフを定量化するための2つのデザインベースの指標を提案しました。ドメイン固有の好みを組み込んだ因果推定量選択手順を導入しました。

主要な成果:

  • 提案されたフレームワークと手順は、バイアスとバリアンスの間のトレードオフを効果的に示しています。この方法論により、集団の保存またはバイアスの削減に対する好みに基づいて、因果推定量を選択できます。右心カテーテル検査データを使用してフレームワークの適用を実証しました。

結論:

  • このフレームワークは、特にオーバーラップの制限と共変量の不均衡に関連する、観察データを使用した因果推論における課題に対処するための構造化されたアプローチを提供します。研究者は、提案された指標と選択手順を利用して、特定の研究目標に合わせて因果推定量ターゲティングに関する情報に基づいた意思決定を行うことができます。この研究は、観察的健康研究から得られた因果効果推定値の信頼性と解釈可能性を高めます。