刺激と反応の結合における容量制限
Lorena Hell1, Philip Schmalbrock1, Christoph Felix Geissler2
1Department of Cognitive Psychology, Trier University, Germany; Institute for Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (ICAN), Trier University, Germany.
Abstract:
Executing a response results in associations between features of stimuli and the response stored in a temporary memory trace or 'event file'. Reencountering any feature retrieves the entire event file which in turn affects performance in the current action episode. Event files not only include task-relevant features but also features from stimuli that are task-irrelevant but accompanying the target. So far, however, the potential capacity limit of an event file has been ignored. Are all irrelevant features integrated into event files? When transferring the concept of event files to everyday life situations, it becomes clear that this is very likely not the case. Thus, we investigated capacity limits for simultaneous bindings in three experiments (together N = 154) by testing capacity-related boundaries with different set sizes of polygon stimuli. Stimulus-response binding effects were observed for irrelevant polygon stimuli with small set sizes but not with larger set sizes. Our results suggest that (i) event files do have capacity limits and (ii) that these limits could be linked to filter or capacity theories of attention and short-term memory.
関連する概念動画
Lung Capacity
Limiting Reactant
The Number e as a Limit
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
Ligand Binding and Linkage
Respiratory Capacities
One key metric is the Inspiratory Capacity (IC), which represents the maximum amount of air that can be inhaled with full effort. IC is calculated by summing the tidal volume and inspiratory reserve volume, typically ranging from 2.4 to 3.6 liters.
The Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) represents the air in the...


