声帯ポリプの術後の声療法の結果:体系的なレビューとメタ解析
Kun Yang1, Qingzhu You1, Shibin Huang2
1Chongqing Three Gorges Medical College, College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 366 Tianxing Road, Bai'anba, Wanzhou District, Chongqing, China.
まとめ
術後の声療法は,声帯ポリプ手術後の声の質を大幅に改善し,声の障害指数を下げ,音響の測定値を高めます. 研究の限界のため,さらなる研究が必要である.
科学分野:
- 耳鼻喉科 (Otorhinolaryngology) は,耳鼻喉科 (Otorhinolaryngology) を専門とする医療機関である.
- 言語言語病理学 言語言語病理学 言語言語病理学 言語言語病理学
- リハビリテーション医学 リハビリテーション医学
背景:
- 声帯のポリプは,音声の質を著しく損なう可能性があります.
- 声療法は,保守的な管理と術後の回復の重要な構成要素です.
- 手術後の声療法の有効性を評価することは,患者のアウトカムにとって不可欠です.
研究 の 目的:
- 声帯ポリプ手術を受けた患者の声の質に関する術後の声療法の影響を体系的に評価する.
- 声療法の有効性に関するランダム化対照試験 (RCT) の証拠を合成する.
主な方法:
- PRISMAのガイドラインに従って,体系的な文献検索が行われました.
- 730人の患者を対象とした9つのRCTがメタ解析に含まれていた.
- 音声障害指数 (VHI),ジッター,シャイマー,DSI,最大音声時間 (MPT) のデータを分析した.
主要な成果:
- 手術後の声療法は,VHIスコアを著しく低下させました.
- 治療により,ジッター,シャイマー,DSIの有意な改善が見られた.
- 音声療法では最大音声時間も著しく延長された.
結論:
- 術後の声療法は,ポリプ手術後の複数の声の品質パラメータを改善するのに有効です.
- 発見は,研究における有意な異質性および控えめなサンプルサイズのため,慎重に解釈する必要があります.
- より大きなコホートと標準化されたプロトコルを持つ高品質のRCTは,将来の研究のために推奨されます.
関連する概念動画
Review and Preview
8.4K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.4K
Review and Preview
11.6K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.6K
Random and Systematic Errors
15.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.3K
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
6.1K
Substituents on the benzene ring that direct an incoming electrophile to undergo substitution at the meta position are called meta directors. All meta directors either have a positive charge on the atom directly bonded to the ring or a partial positive charge. These groups function by withdrawing electrons from the ring through inductive and resonance effects. Consider the carbocation intermediates formed upon the addition of an electrophile on nitrobenzene at the...
6.1K
Systematic Sampling Method
13.4K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.4K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
1.5K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K


