PS/TiO2ナノファイバー直径の予測のための人工ニューラルネットワーク設計パラメータの効果
R Seda Tığlı Aydın1, Fevziye Eğilmez1, Ceren Kaya1
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Incivez, Zonguldak 67100, Turkey.
Polymers
|February 13, 2026
まとめ
人工ニューラルネットワーク (ANN) は,ポリスティレンおよびPS/TiO2ナノファイバーの直径を正確に予測します. 最適化された多層パーセプトン (MLP) と半径ベース関数 (RBF) モデルは,正確な構造特性の予測を通じて,材料設計を進める.
科学分野:
- マテリアルサイエンス 材料科学
- ナノテクノロジー ナノテクノロジー
- コンピューティング・モデリング
背景:
- エレクトロスピニングは,ポリマーナノファイバーを製造するための重要な技術です.
- ナノファイバーの直径を予測することは,材料の特性を調整するために非常に重要です.
- 人工ニューラルネットワーク (ANN) は,材料科学における予測モデリングの可能性を秘めています.
研究 の 目的:
- ポリスチレン (PS) とPS/TiO2ナノファイバーの直径を予測するためのANNモデルを開発・最適化.
- 多層パルセプトン (MLP) と半径ベース関数 (RBF) のアーキテクチャのパフォーマンスを比較する.
- 合理的な材料設計と合成のためのデータ主導の枠組みを確立する.
主な方法:
- PSとPS/TiO2ナノファイバーの製造は,電気回転による.
- 繊維直径の定量的な特徴.
- システムおよびプロセスパラメータを入力として使用したMLPおよびRBFANの開発.
- 隠された層ニューロン数を含むANNアーキテクチャの最適化.
- 平均平方誤差 (MSE) メトリックを用いた検証.
主要な成果:
- 最適化されたMLPモデルは,4.03 × 10−3 (クラス1) と7.01 × 10−3 (クラス2) のMSEを達成しました.
- 最適化されたRBFモデルは,1.42 × 10−32 (クラス1) と2.75 × 10−32 (クラス2) の著しく低いMSEを達成しました.
- ANNモデルのパフォーマンスは,アーキテクチャの最適化に大きく依存していました.
結論:
- 最適化されたANNフレームワークは,ナノ構造材料の構造特性を予測するための強力なツールです.
- この研究は,データ駆動モデリングにおける方法論的厳格性の重要性を強調しています.
- これらの予測能力は,合理的な材料設計とナノファイバーの合成をサポートします.
関連する概念動画
Design Example: Calculating Safe Diameter for Wind-Exposed Disc
363
Assessing safety in wind-exposed installations is crucial to preventing potential failures. This example explores the calculation and design adjustments needed to mount a circular disc on a building facade, where wind forces are a primary concern. A 4-meter diameter disc was initially designed as an aesthetic feature facing winds at a velocity of 25 meters per second, with an air density of 1.25 kilograms per cubic meter. Given these conditions, the drag force on the disc was determined using...
363
Protein Networks
4.6K
An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
4.6K
Factorial Design
14.2K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
14.2K
Predicting Molecular Geometry
46.1K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
46.1K
Network Covalent Solids
16.2K
Network covalent solids contain a three-dimensional network of covalently bonded atoms as found in the crystal structures of nonmetals like diamond, graphite, silicon, and some covalent compounds, such as silicon dioxide (sand) and silicon carbide (carborundum, the abrasive on sandpaper). Many minerals have networks of covalent bonds.
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
16.2K
Group Design
10.8K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.8K


