大規模な臨床試験における著者資格を決定するためのポイントベースのシステム: ISCHEMIA試験の著者指名システムからの洞察
Shari Esquenazi-Karonika1, Judith S Hochman1, June Lyo1
1Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA.
Journal of clinical and translational science
|February 16, 2026
まとめ
チームサイエンスにおける著者資格のための新しいスコア制度は,サイトのパフォーマンスに基づいて,透明で客観的で公平であることが判明しました. このメリットに基づくアプローチは,大規模な研究協力の公平性を高めます.
科学分野:
- 心血管科学の研究について
- クリニック・トライアル 臨床試験
- 科学的協力について
背景:
- チームサイエンスの著者招待状は,主観的で秘密に包まれることがあります.
- 320のサイトを対象としたISCHEMIA試験には,透明な著者法が必要でした.
- 既存のモデルは,客観的で公平な著者資格制度を作成するために適応されました.
研究 の 目的:
- ISCHEMIA試験の透明で客観的で公平な著者資格制度を開発・実施する.
- 大規模なチーム科学における貢献の公正な認識を確保する.
主な方法:
- サイトパフォーマンスが国際医学雑誌編集委員会 (ICMJME) の著者基準を満たした基準に基づいて,スコアシステムが開発されました.
- サイトはポイントでランク付けされ,作者のために必要なポイントが伝えられました.
- 執筆グループに対する著者の好みが調査され,非現場の調査者貢献者向けにポジションが予約された.
主要な成果:
- 33カ国から208人の著者による50本の原稿が出版されました.
- 少なくとも15人の参加者をランダムに選択したサイトの72%は,著者の地位を達成しました.
- 調査対象の著者は,この制度が透明 (81%),客観的 (83%),公平 (キャリアの初期に70%,少数派に57%) であると回答した.
結論:
- ISCHEMIA試験では,ポイントベースの著者制度を成功裏に導入しました.
- 制度は客観的で,メリットに基づいた,透明で,ほとんどの著者によって公平であると認識されました.
- このパフォーマンスベースの著者モデルは,将来のチームサイエンスの出版物で考慮することをお勧めします.
関連する概念動画
Clinical Trials
10.9K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
10.9K
Determination
21.1K
During embryogenesis, cells become progressively committed to different fates through a two-step process: specification followed by determination. Specification is demonstrated by removing a segment of an early embryo, “neutrally” culturing the tissue in vitro—for example, in a petri dish with simple medium—and then observing the derivatives. If the cultured region gives rise to cell types that it would normally generate in the embryo, this means that it is specified. In...
21.1K
Inductive Reasoning
68.1K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
68.1K
Ischemic Heart Disease: Overview
3.5K
Ischemic heart disease occurs when the heart's blood supply dwindles, causing an ominous lack of oxygen and nutrients. This deficiency, stemming from reduced or obstructed blood flow, spells danger, leading to heart muscle damage and dysfunction.
Atherosclerosis, the primary malefactor, orchestrates this dangerous condition. It manifests as the accumulation of fatty deposits, akin to insidious plaques, within arterial walls. As time elapses, these plaques metamorphose, hardening and...
Atherosclerosis, the primary malefactor, orchestrates this dangerous condition. It manifests as the accumulation of fatty deposits, akin to insidious plaques, within arterial walls. As time elapses, these plaques metamorphose, hardening and...
3.5K
Deductive Reasoning
69.6K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
69.6K
X-linked Traits
59.0K
In most mammalian species, females have two X sex chromosomes and males have an X and Y. As a result, mutations on the X chromosome in females may be masked by the presence of a normal allele on the second X. In contrast, a mutation on the X chromosome in males more often causes observable biological defects, as there is no normal X to compensate. Trait variations arising from mutations on the X chromosome are called “X-linked”.
59.0K


