関連する実験動画
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

07:47
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
Published on: January 9, 2016
16.1K
タイムリー・ディスカウントの日付/遅延効果の知覚的な説明を突き刺す
1School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Experimental psychology
|February 16, 2026
まとめ
人は,より大きい,遅いものよりも,より小さい,早い報酬を好む. しかし,期限付きの報酬は,遅延があるものよりも短いものとして認識され,時間割引に影響を与えます.
科学分野:
- 行動経済学は,行動経済学である.
- 認知心理学とは,認知心理学である.
- 意思決定科学 意思決定科学
背景:
- タイムリー・ディスカウントは,より大きい,遅い (LL) 報酬よりも,より小さい,早い (SS) 報酬を優先することを説明します.
- このディスカウント効果は,時間の表現方法によって調節され,最終日は遅延と比較して効果を軽減します.
- 差分時間推定仮説は,終了日が等価な遅延よりも短い期間として認識されていることを示唆しています.
研究 の 目的:
- 日付/遅延効果に関する時間差推定仮説を客観的に調査する.
- 時間の長さの主観的な知覚を定量化するために,日数での遅延と対比して終了日として提示される.
- 主観的な評価スケールを用いた以前の研究の方法論的限界に対処するために.
主な方法:
- 2つのオンライン実験 (N=140,N=80) は,心理物理的差別タスクを使用しました.
- 参加者は,終了日または数日の遅延として提示された期間を比較しました.
- 客観的なタイミング決定は,知覚された持続時間差を評価するために使用されました.
主要な成果:
- 一貫したバイアスが観察され,日付は同等の遅延よりも短いと認識されました.
- 主観的な平等のポイント (PSE) は,このバイアスを定量化し,約83% (Study 1) と93% (Study 2) の遅延-to-date比率を明らかにしました.
- これらの発見は,時間差推定仮説を支持する客観的な証拠を提供します.
結論:
- 時間の枠付け方法 (最終日と遅延) は,主観的な持続時間認識に大きく影響します.
- この知覚バイアスは,時間的な値下げ行動に影響を与え,差異時間推定仮説を支持します.
- 客観的な心理物理学的方法は,時間認識バイアスを研究するための堅実なアプローチを提供します.
関連する概念動画
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
452
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
452
Framing Effects
8.0K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
8.0K
Factors Affecting Perception
2.8K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
2.8K
Reason and Intuition
7.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.5K
First Impression
243
First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
243
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.8K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.8K

