Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

14.3K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
14.3K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.5K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.5K
Multicompartment Models: Overview01:14

Multicompartment Models: Overview

611
Multicompartment models are mathematical constructs that depict how drugs are distributed and eliminated within the body. They segment the body into several compartments, symbolizing various physiological or anatomical areas connected through drug transfer processes such as absorption, metabolism, distribution, and elimination.
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
611
Compacting Factor test01:22

Compacting Factor test

611
The compacting factor test is a method used to assess the workability of concrete. It is  especially suitable for concrete mixes containing aggregates up to one and a half inches in size. This test involves specialized equipment consisting of two truncated cone-shaped hoppers and a cylinder, all with polished interior surfaces to minimize friction.
The procedure begins by placing concrete into the upper hopper without any compaction. Once filled, the bottom door of this hopper is opened,...
611
Composite Bodies00:55

Composite Bodies

1.4K
A composite body is a body made up of multiple parts, connected to form a larger, unified object. Each part has its own weight and center of gravity, which must be considered to determine the center of gravity of the composite body. In cases where the density or specific weight is constant, the center of gravity coincides with the centroid.
Composite bodies have widespread applications in mechanical engineering, from automobiles to aircraft to rockets. For example, an automobile wheel comprises...
1.4K
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity01:23

Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity

839
The similarity hypothesis suggests that individuals are more likely to form relationships with others who share similar attitudes, beliefs, values, and interests. This concept has been widely studied in social psychology, demonstrating that perceived similarity fosters interpersonal attraction. In an experiment supporting this hypothesis, participants were presented with fabricated information indicating that strangers held attitudes similar to their own. The results showed that participants...
839

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Ultra-Fast Implementation of Multivariate GWAS in Genomic SEM Using Flexible Analytic Estimation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Moment-to-Moment Coordination of Parent-Infant Visual Attention: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Framework Within Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

The InterModel Vigorish as a Lens for Understanding (and Quantifying) the Value of Item Response Models for Dichotomously Coded Items.

Psychometrika·2026
Same author

Calculating and Interpreting Maximal Reliability in Bifactor Models.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same author

Improving the Measurement of the Big Five via Alternative Formats for the BFI-2.

Journal of personality assessment·2025
Same author

Time spent alone and loneliness in Mexican-origin youth: The role of social relationships and personality.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2025
Same journal

Bayesian evaluation for latent variable models: A tutorial on computing information criteria and bayes factors with the r package bleval.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A stochastic block prior for clustering in graphical models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Three-level vector autoregressive models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Scaling cognitive modeling to big data: A deep learning approach to studying individual differences in evidence accumulation model parameters.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Best practices in multilevel modeling for within-cluster group comparisons: An evaluation of coding strategies reflecting group composition and heterogeneity.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A unified framework for psychometrics in experimental psychology: The standardized generalized hierarchical factor model.

Psychological methods·2026
関連記事をすべて見る

関連する実験動画

Updated: Feb 19, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K

共通因子と複合物の間の内蔵モデル比較

Danielle Siegel1, Victoria Savalei2, Mijke Rhemtulla1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis.

Psychological methods
|February 17, 2026
PubMed
まとめ
この要約は機械生成です。

心理学の研究はしばしば反射的なモデルを使用しますが,形成的なモデルはデータに適しているかもしれません. この研究では,反射型と形成型モデルが内蔵されていることが示され,キ二乗差のテストのような統計的テストを使用して比較が可能です.

さらに関連する動画

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K
Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
08:51

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts

Published on: September 20, 2024

2.2K

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Feb 19, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K
Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
08:51

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts

Published on: September 20, 2024

2.2K

科学分野:

  • 心理的な測定法
  • 構造方程式モデリング
  • サイコメトリクス サイコメトリクス

背景:

  • 反射的確認因子分析 (CFA) は,心理学研究における支配的な測定モデルである.
  • 形成的な測定モデルは,ある種の心理学的データに対して理論的に適切であるとますます認識されています.
  • 既存の構造方程式モデリング (SEM) フレームワークでは,形成性複合材料の直接的な仕様が欠けている.

研究 の 目的:

  • 反射的なCFAの理論的および経験的なネスティング構造,形成的なヘンセラー-オガサワラ確認複合分析,およびSEM内の形成的な擬似指標モデルを実証する.
  • 組み込みモデル比較技術,特にキ平方差分テストおよびRMSEA (RMSEA_D) の有用性を評価し,反射型および形成型測定モデルを区別する.
  • 測定モデルの選択と比較に関する研究者のための実践的なガイドラインと経験的例を提供すること.

主な方法:

  • 構造方程式モデリング (SEM) フレームワーク内の3つの内蔵測定モデルの仕様:反射的なCFA,形成的なHenseler-Ogasawara確認複合分析,および形成的な擬似指標モデル.
  • 構造コンポーネントが飽和したときに,これらのモデル間の階層的な関係の理論的および経験的実証.
  • 異なる条件下 (サンプルサイズ,指標重量,外部相関) で反射型と形成型モデルの差別化におけるチ2差分試験とRMSEA_Dのパフォーマンスを評価するためのシミュレーション研究.

主要な成果:

  • 反射的なCFA,形成的なヘンセラー・オガサワラ確認複合分析,形成的な擬似指標モデルが,飽和した構造条件下で相互に組み込まれていることが示されています.
  • Chi-square差のテストとRMSEA_Dは,反射的および形成的測定モデルを確実に区別する可能性を示しているが,パフォーマンスはサンプルサイズ,指標重量,およびコンストラクート相関によって異なります.
  • 経験的な例は,反射的および形成的測定アプローチの間の実用的な差別化のために,内蔵モデル比較ツールの適用を例示しています.

結論:

  • 反射的および形成的測定モデルは,組み込みモデル比較技術を使用して,統一されたSEMフレームワーク内で公式に比較することができます.
  • 研究者は,反射的な測定モデルと形成的な測定モデルの間の選択を実証的に検証するために,チ平方差分テストのような統計的テストを活用することができます.
  • 結論は,理論的に正当な場合,心理学研究における形成的な測定モデルのより広範な採用と厳格な評価を支持しています.