共有意思決定と不確実性の相互作用 - 概念的分析と経験的例示
Arwen H Pieterse1, Fiorella L Huijgens2, Ruben D Vromans3
1Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; University of Oslo, Faculty of Medicine, Oslo, Norway.
Patient education and counseling
|February 20, 2026
まとめ
共有意思決定 (SDM) は,臨床医と患者の間の不確実性をナビゲートすることを含む. この研究では,治療決定の際に不確実性がどのように現れ,どのように管理されるかを調査し,この相互作用に対処するためにSDMトレーニングの必要性を強調しています.
科学分野:
- 医療における意思決定
- 患者と臨床医のコミュニケーション
- 健康心理学 健康心理学について
背景:
- 治療の選択肢が不確実なときに,共有意思決定 (SDM) は極めて重要です.
- 臨床医も患者もSDM中に不確実性を経験します.
- SDMと不確実性の交差点は,さらなる探求を必要とする.
研究 の 目的:
- SDMにおける不確実性がどのように現われ,臨床医と患者にどのような影響を与えるかを概念的に説明する.
- 治療に関する意思決定における不確実性の表現と交渉を,経験的に説明する.
主な方法:
- SDMにおける不確実性に関する文献検索.
- ビデオに収録された腫瘍学診察の調査分析.
- 不確実性に焦点を当てた臨床医と患者の相互作用の微小分析.
主要な成果:
- SDMにおける患者の関与は,臨床医と患者の間で不確実性の相互交換を伴う.
- 臨床医と患者は,不確実性の認識を積極的に明確にする.
- 臨床医は不確実性を交渉するための戦略を採用しますが,コンセンサス達成は不明です.
結論:
- この研究は,不確実性とSDMの相互作用の理解を高める.
- 不確実性の対処と交渉は,SDMにおける患者の効果的な参加に不可欠です.
- SDMトレーニングは,不確実性の共有理解を管理するために臨床医を装備する必要があります.
キーワード:
コンセプトレビュー 概念レビュー臨床相互作用の微小分析交渉 交渉 交渉腫瘍学 腫瘍学SDM SDMは,SDMとは,SDMとは,SDMとは,SDMとは,SDMとはトリートメント 治療法不確実性 不確実性とはさらに関連する動画
13:04Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
12.5K
06:18The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
2.6K
関連する概念動画
01:14Decision Making: Traditional Method
5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.6K
01:20Decision Making
1.1K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.1K
00:59Uncertainty: Overview
1.8K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.8K
01:09Decision Making: P-value Method
7.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.0K
01:37Reason and Intuition
7.6K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.6K
00:54Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
11.8K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
11.8K