Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

3.1K
Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
3.1K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

25.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.9K
Ethical Dilemmas I01:17

Ethical Dilemmas I

2.1K
Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
2.1K
Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

2.3K
Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
2.3K
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

2.5K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
2.5K
Nursing Ethical Principles II01:27

Nursing Ethical Principles II

2.3K
Ethical principles are essential in guiding nurses to fulfill their responsibilities, focusing on the quality of nursing care and decision-making. These principles, including autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity, shape the ethical framework within healthcare settings.
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
2.3K

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) in society. Healthcare providers and researchers' views on the public health and socio-cultural implications of PRS in healthcare contexts.

Journal of community genetics·2026
Same author

Beyond Good Intentions: A Justice-Based Critique of Short-Term Medical Missions.

Journal of religion and health·2026
Same author

Polygenic risk scores in healthcare contexts: what's the scope? An interview study of European healthcare providers and researchers' perspectives on ethical challenges.

Human genetics·2025
Same author

Conscientious objection in euthanasia and assisted suicide: A systematic review.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Polygenic risk scores in the clinic: a systematic review of stakeholders' perspectives, attitudes, and experiences.

European journal of human genetics : EJHG·2024
Same author

Shared decision-making in adolescent healthcare: a literature review of ethical considerations.

European journal of pediatrics·2024

関連する実験動画

Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.4K

生物倫理は学科なのか? 方法論的還元主義を超えて

Carlos Gomez-Virseda1, Lara Andreoli2, Roshni Jegan2

  • 1Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. carlos.gomezvirseda@kuleuven.be.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy
|February 20, 2026
PubMed
まとめ

生物倫理は,単なる学際的な分野ではなく,独特の学術分野である. 多元主義と規範的焦点を含む,そのユニークな特徴は,複雑な医療と医療問題に対処する上でその地位を肯定します.

キーワード:
バイオエシック バイオエシック概念分析 概念分析について規律性についてです.方法論 方法論 方法論規範的倫理学とは,規範的な倫理学である.

さらに関連する動画

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.3K
Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management
08:01

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management

Published on: November 30, 2022

5.7K

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.4K
Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.3K
Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management
08:01

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management

Published on: November 30, 2022

5.7K

科学分野:

  • バイオエシック バイオエシック
  • 科学の哲学 科学の哲学
  • 医学ヒューマニティスは,医学ヒューマニティスです.

背景:

  • 独立した学科としての生物倫理の定義と地位は,その創設以来,議論されてきた.
  • 規律の定義の基準と生物倫理の期待される貢献に関して,継続的な緊張が存在します.
  • この記事は,概念的分析を通して,生物倫理の規律性に関する議論を扱っています.

研究 の 目的:

  • 生物倫理の規律的地位に関する既存の議論を批判的に評価する.
  • 生物倫理の文脈における規律性のより広く,よりダイナミックな理解を提案する.
  • 生物倫理学が学問の核心要素を満たしていることを示す.

主な方法:

  • 概念分析は,生物倫理の規律性に関する議論を再考するために使用されました.
  • ブヨーン・ホフマンの狭い,方法論的視点の規律性に対する批判的な取り組み.
  • クリシュナンの包括的な枠組みを採択し,規律性の6つのコア要素に対して生物倫理を評価する.

主要な成果:

  • ホフマンの規律性の基準は過度に制限的で,現在の学術慣行と矛盾していることが判明しました.
  • 生物倫理は,特定の研究対象,専門知識,構造理論,共有された用語,特定の方法,および制度的表れを示す.
  • この分野の多元主義と規範的指向は,複雑なテーマに対する適切な対応である.

結論:

  • 生物倫理は,学問の6つのコア要素を満たし,その地位を肯定します.
  • フィールドの特徴は,しばしば弱点として見られるが,実際には,その主題と一致する強みである.
  • 生物倫理は,哲学的な反省と医学と医療における実践的な関与を結びつける正当で独立した学問である.