Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.4K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.4K
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.8K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.8K
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

604
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
604
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

1.2K
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.2K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.4K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.4K
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

8.3K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
8.3K

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Aging Out of the Blue: Region-Specific Epigenetic Clock Calibration for a Blue Zone with the DNAm SuperLearner.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same authorSame journal

Discovery of critical thresholds in mixed exposures and estimation of policy intervention effects.

Journal of causal inference·2026
Same authorSame journal

Semiparametric discovery and estimation of interaction in mixed exposures using stochastic interventions.

Journal of causal inference·2026
Same author

Multiomic analyses of longitudinal plasma samples identify thromboinflammation endotypes and trajectories in patients with trauma.

Science translational medicine·2026
Same author

Associations between floor material and <i>E. coli</i> contamination in rural Bangladeshi households.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Using machine learning to identify subgroups with the highest expected benefit in a population-based water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition intervention.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same journal

Testing for treatment effect twice using internal and external controls in clinical trials.

Journal of causal inference·2026
Same journal

An approach to nonparametric inference on the causal dose-response function.

Journal of causal inference·2026
Same journal

Assessing surrogate heterogeneity in real world data using meta-learners.

Journal of causal inference·2026
Same journal

Estimating average causal effects with incomplete exposure and confounders.

Journal of causal inference·2026
関連記事をすべて見る

関連する実験動画

Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster
07:02

Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster

Published on: March 24, 2023

4.3K

二値化の架け橋：二値化された連続曝露因果推論

Kaitlyn Lee1, Alan Hubbard1, Alejandro Schuler1

  • 1Division of Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley, USA.

Journal of causal inference
|February 23, 2026
PubMed
まとめ
この要約は機械生成です。

連続曝露の二値化は、有効な因果推論手法です。この研究は、その統計的妥当性を示し、より関連性の高い因果的曝露に関する質問のための新しいパラメータを導入します。

キーワード:
62D20連続曝露修正治療方針観察的因果推論

さらに関連する動画

Chronic Intermittent Ethanol Vapor Exposure Paired with Two-Bottle Choice to Model Alcohol Use Disorder
05:12

Chronic Intermittent Ethanol Vapor Exposure Paired with Two-Bottle Choice to Model Alcohol Use Disorder

Published on: June 23, 2023

1.7K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster
07:02

Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster

Published on: March 24, 2023

4.3K
Chronic Intermittent Ethanol Vapor Exposure Paired with Two-Bottle Choice to Model Alcohol Use Disorder
05:12

Chronic Intermittent Ethanol Vapor Exposure Paired with Two-Bottle Choice to Model Alcohol Use Disorder

Published on: June 23, 2023

1.7K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K

科学分野:

  • 因果推論
  • 生物統計学
  • 疫学

背景:

  • 平均処置効果（ATE）は通常、二値曝露に対して定義されます。
  • 連続曝露はしばしば二値化されますが、統計的な懸念が生じます。
  • 連続曝露のための既存の方法は、明確な解釈を欠いています。

研究 の 目的:

  • 連続曝露のための統計的に健全な方法として二値化を検証すること。
  • 二値化された因果効果推定量の仮定と解釈を明確にすること。
  • より関連性の高い因果的質問のための新しいパラメータを導入すること。

主な方法:

  • 二値化ATEと修正治療方針との間の等価性の証明。
  • 仮定された相対的自己選択の保存の実証。
  • 新しいベンチマークされたターゲットパラメータの導入。

主要な成果:

  • 二値化は、特定の修正治療方針と同等です。
  • 二値化の根底にある仮定と推定量の解釈が明確になりました。
  • より関連性の高い因果的質問に対処する新しいパラメータを提案しました。

結論:

  • 二値化は、連続曝露を用いた因果推論のための有効なアプローチです。
  • 適切な解釈のためには、仮定の理解と明記が重要です。
  • 新しいパラメータは、因果分析のためのより関連性の高いベンチマークを提供します。