脳卒中後の構造的コネクティビティ障害の評価:個別トラクトグラフィーかモデルベースアプローチの使用か?
Franziska E Hildesheim1, Keith W Jamison2, Ilana R Leppert3
1Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montréal, QC, Canada; Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada; Canadian Platform for Trials in Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (CanStim), Montréal, QC, Canada.
NeuroImage. Clinical
|February 24, 2026
まとめ
虚血性脳卒中後の構造的コネクティビティ障害(SCD)は、個別トラクトグラフィーまたはNeMoのようなモデルベースツールを使用して評価できます。両方の方法がSCDパターンを捉えますが、特に高齢者では違いが現れ、患者および年齢固有のニーズに合わせたアプローチが示唆されます。
関連する概念動画
Typical Model Studies
Fluid mechanics model studies often utilize scaled-down systems to predict fluid behavior in full-scale environments, such as river flows, dam spillways, and structures interacting with open surfaces. Maintaining Froude number similarity in river models is crucial, as it replicates surface flow features like wave patterns and velocities.
Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway
Scaled hydraulic models of dam spillways provide a practical way to replicate and study the intricate flow dynamics of these structures. Often built to a 1:15 ratio, these models allow for observing critical water behavior, such as velocity distribution, flow patterns, and energy dissipation.


