関連する実験動画
Updated: Feb 26, 2026
Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans
Published on: July 12, 2022
Demirjianの方法を用いた自動歯齢推定のためのDental Ageアプリの検証
Allan Abuabara1, Mariana Espindola de Oliveira1, Livia Azeredo Alves Antunes1,2,3
1Postgraduate Program in Health and Environment, University from the Joinville Region - Univille, Joinville, Brazil.
Introduction:
Dental age estimation is an essential tool in clinical, orthodontic, and forensic contexts, with Demirjian's method (1973) being one of the most widely used worldwide. Recently, digital resources have been developed to automate this process, such as the Dental Age application (Crescendo Treinamentos Avançados, Brazil), available in English for iOS and Android. The aim of this study was to validate the Dental Age app for dental age estimation using Demirjian's method, by assessing its accuracy in relation to chronological age and its agreement with the manual approach.
Methods:
This retrospective cross-sectional study used a convenience sample of 63 panoramic radiographs of healthy children treated at a university pediatric dentistry clinic in Nova Friburgo, RJ, Brazil, aged 3-16 years. The mineralization stages of the seven left mandibular teeth were classified by an experienced orthodontist. Dental age was estimated in two ways: (I) manual Demirjian's method and (II) automated analysis using the Dental Age app. Chronological age was used as the reference. Performance metrics (Mean Absolute Error-MAE, Mean Squared Error-MSE, Root Mean Squared Error-RMSE, and coefficient of determination-R 2) were calculated, and Bland-Altman analysis was performed.
Results:
The sample included 25 boys (40%) with a mean chronological age of 12.4 years (range: 8.2-15.9) and 38 girls (60%) with a mean chronological age of 12.8 years (range: 7.5-15.9). The Dental Age app showed a MAE of 0.92 years, RMSE of 1.29, and R 2 of 0.63, while the manual method obtained a MAE of 0.91 years, RMSE of 1.30, and R 2 of 0.63. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean bias of 0.04 years, indicating a high level of agreement between methods. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was 0.99, indicating excellent agreement between the Dental Age application and the traditional Demirjian method.
Conclusion:
The Dental Age app demonstrated equivalent performance to the traditional method, presenting itself as a practical and reliable tool for dental age estimation in children and adolescents.
