Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

522
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
522
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.8K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.8K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

10.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.9K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

6.8K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
6.8K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

4.2K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
4.2K
Two-Way ANOVA01:17

Two-Way ANOVA

3.5K
The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
3.5K

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

A Note on Ising Network Analysis with Missing Data.

Psychometrika·2026
Same author

Maximum Softly Penalized Likelihood in Factor Analysis.

Psychometrika·2026
Same author

Combining Propensity Scores and Common Items for Test Score Equating.

Applied psychological measurement·2025
Same author

Unfolding the Network of Peer Grades: A Latent Variable Approach.

Psychometrika·2025
Same author

Exact Exploratory Bi-factor Analysis: A Constraint-Based Optimization Approach.

Psychometrika·2025
Same author

The generalized Hausman test for detecting non-normality in the latent variable distribution of the two-parameter IRT model.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2024
Same journal

Testing linear hypotheses in repeated measures generalized linear models using external information.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

When Do Unifactorial Items Increase the Reliability?

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal Designs for Diagnostic Models: Identification and Estimation.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Modeling Rare Events and Nonmonotone Nonignorable Missingness of Time-Varying Outcomes and Predictors in Binary Time-Series Daily Diary Data: A Bayesian Selection Model.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Revelle's Beta: The Wait Is Over-Computation Becomes Possible.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

On dimensional implication graphs.

Psychometrika·2026
関連記事をすべて見る

関連する実験動画

Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K

未知グループとアンカー項目を持つDIF分析

Gabriel Wallin1, Yunxiao Chen2, Irini Moustaki2

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University.

Psychometrika
|February 25, 2026
PubMed
まとめ
この要約は機械生成です。

この研究は、サブグループとアンカー項目の両方の情報が未知の場合の項目間機能差（DIF）分析のための新しい統計的枠組みを導入する。この手法は、潜在クラスとL1正則化を使用してDIF項目を特定し、グループ差を推定し、評価における公平性を向上させる。

キーワード:
項目応答理論における項目間機能差ラッソ潜在DIF潜在クラス分析測定不変性

さらに関連する動画

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

科学分野:

  • 心理測定学
  • 統計モデリング
  • 教育測定

背景:

  • 調査およびテストにおける公平性の確保は極めて重要です。
  • 項目間機能差（DIF）分析は、項目レベルの測定不変性を評価します。
  • 従来のDIF手法では、利用できないことが多い既知の比較グループとアンカー項目が必要です。

研究 の 目的:

  • 比較グループとアンカー項目の両方が未知の場合のDIF分析のための一般的な統計的枠組みを提案すること。
  • 潜在サブグループとDIF項目の両方を同時に特定する手法を開発すること。
  • 提案されたモデルを解決するための計算効率の高いアルゴリズムを提供すること。

主な方法:

  • 潜在クラスを介して未知のグループをモデル化する新しい統計的枠組み。
  • 項目固有のDIFパラメータの導入。
  • 潜在クラスとDIF項目の両方を同時に特定するためのL1正則化推定値。
  • 最適化のための計算効率の高い期待値最大化（EM）アルゴリズム。

主要な成果:

  • 提案された枠組みは、グループまたはアンカー項目に関する事前知識なしでDIF分析を効果的に処理します。
  • シミュレーション研究は、方法のパフォーマンスを示しています。
  • このアプローチは、実際の教育テストデータに正常に適用されました。

結論:

  • 開発された統計的枠組みは、困難なシナリオでのDIF分析のための堅牢なソリューションを提供します。
  • この手法は、教育および調査ツールにおける測定不変性と公平性の評価を強化します。
  • この発見は、項目バイアス検出のための心理測定法の進歩に貢献します。