統計における偶発的誤差とその変数間関係および複合測定結果のテストへの影響
Paul De Boeck1, Michael L DeKay1, Jolynn Pek1
1The Ohio State University.
Psychometrika
|February 25, 2026
まとめ
偶発的誤差は、観測データのランダムな歪みを考慮することで、近似的なモデル適合を説明する。この概念は、統計的検出力と測定の不確かさに影響を与え、研究のばらつきを理解するための枠組みを提供する。
科学分野:
- 統計学
- 心理測定学
- データ分析
背景:
- Wu & Browne (2015) によって導入された偶発的誤差は、共分散構造モデル(CSM)における近似的な適合に対処する。
- これは、観測されたデータ行列が、実装の違いにより理論的な行列からランダムに歪められていると仮定する。
- この歪みは、統計的推論の精度に影響を与える。
研究 の 目的:
- CSMの範囲を超えて偶発的誤差の概念を一般化すること。
- 標準誤差、効果サイズ、統計的検出力、測定不確かさに対するその結果を例示すること。
- 研究のばらつきを理解するための統計的枠組みを提供すること。
主な方法:
- シミュレーションを使用して、ペアワイズ関係における標準誤差に対する偶発的誤差の影響を実証した。
- 導出を使用して、偶発的誤差、効果サイズ異質性、および統計的検出力の過大評価との関連を調査した。
- さらなるシミュレーションで、因子スコアや合計スコアなどの複合スコアに対する偶発的誤差の影響を評価した。
主要な成果:
- 偶発的誤差は、標準誤差に対する影響が、CSM外の変数間のペアワイズ関係にも及ぶこと。
- 偶発的誤差は、研究間の効果サイズ異質性や統計的検出力の過大評価を説明する可能性がある。
- 複合スコアの測定不確かさへの影響は小さいとされたが、因子スコアの方が合計スコアよりも大きいことが判明した。
結論:
- 偶発的誤差は、近似的な適合、研究結果のばらつき、および検出力の過大評価を理解するための統計的枠組みを提供する。
- 統計モデリングにおけるデータ生成メカニズムを考慮することの重要性を強調する。
- この発見は、研究結果の解釈と将来の研究の設計に影響を与える。
関連する概念動画
Random and Systematic Errors
15.5K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.5K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
11.2K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.2K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
111.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
111.6K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
11.6K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
11.6K
Random Error
9.9K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.9K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
634
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
634


