大規模言語モデルの認知能力検査におけるパフォーマンス:ドイツ医学部入学試験(TMS)における複数回実行評価
Henrik Stelling1, Armin Kraus2, Gerrit Grieb3,4
1Practices for Nuclear Medicine, Rubensstraße 125, 12157 Berlin, Germany.
Background And Objectives:
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated high performance on knowledge-based medical examinations but their capabilities on cognitive aptitude tests emphasizing reasoning and abstraction remain underexplored. The Test for Medical Studies (TMS), a German medical school admission test, provides a standardized framework to examine these capabilities. This study aimed to evaluate the performance and consistency of multiple LLMs on text-based and visual-analytic TMS items.
Materials And Methods:
Eight contemporary LLMs, comprising proprietary and open-source systems, were evaluated using a multi-run design on standardized TMS items spanning text-based and visual-analytic cognitive domains.
Results:
Mean accuracy remained substantially below levels typically reported for knowledge-based medical examinations, with marked performance differences between text-based and visual-analytic subtests. Open-source models performed competitively compared with proprietary systems. Inter-run reliability was heterogeneous, indicating notable variability across repeated evaluations.
Conclusions:
Current LLMs show limited and domain-dependent performance on cognitive aptitude tasks relevant to medical school admission. High accuracy on knowledge-based examinations does not translate into stable performance on aptitude tests emphasizing fluid intelligence. The observed modality-dependent performance patterns and inter-run variability highlight the importance of differentiated, multi-run evaluation strategies when assessing LLMs for applications in medical education.
さらに関連する動画
関連する概念動画
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...


