元ジェノサイド加害者および救助者の服従と抵抗の神経処理
Lola Seyll1, Vincent Sezibera2, François Masabo3
1Department of Experimental Psychology, Moral and Social Brain Lab, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Ghent University.
Abstract:
While influential studies, notably those of Milgram, have been used to explain participation in genocide, none have directly involved individuals who either participated in or resisted genocidal violence. To better understand what drives participation or resistance, this study examines decision-making processes among former genocide perpetrators, rescuers, and bystanders in a controlled task assessing (dis)obedience to harmful orders to take money from a victim. Although former perpetrators were more likely to obey antisocial commands and take money, all groups demonstrated high rates of prosocial disobedience by choosing not to take the money. Electroencephalogram data revealed that rescuers exhibited heightened emotional processing of victims' distress compared to other groups, which was associated with greater prosocial disobedience. The study also challenges the idea that inherent traits drive genocidal violence, as former perpetrators and bystanders showed no differences across various neural processes. Our study provides the first empirical evidence of the specificities of rescuers and offers insights into fostering resistance to harmful social influence. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
さらに関連する動画
関連する概念動画
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Obedience
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Cognitive Dissonance
Bystander Effect
Traumatic Memory


