JAMAのピアレビュープロセスにはジェンダーバイアスがあるのでしょうか?

J R Gilbert¹, E S Williams, G D Lundberg

¹Department of Public Policy, Stanford University, Palo Alto.

JAMA

|July 13, 1994

まとめ

ジェンダー差はJAMAで観察されました.

科学分野:

メディカル・パブリッシング医療出版
科学的ピアレビューは科学的なピアレビューです.

背景:

ピアレビュープロセスの参加者の性別は,原稿の処理と結果に影響を与える可能性があります.
潜在的なジェンダーに基づく格差を理解することは,学術出版における公平性を維持するために極めて重要です.

研究の目的:

1991年にJAMAでピアレビューと原稿処理におけるジェンダーに関連した差異を調査する.
著者または編集者の性別が原稿の受付率に影響するかどうかを判断する.

主な方法:

1991年にJAMAに提出された1851件の研究論文を分析した遡及コホート研究.
データには,ジェンダーに重点を置いた編集者,レビュー者,著者に関する情報が含まれていました.
統計的分析を使用して,有意なジェンダーベースのパターンを特定しました.

主要な成果:

女性編集者は,女性対応著者の手稿をより頻繁に扱った.
男性審査員は,女性審査員と比較して手稿を返却するのに時間がかかりました.
扱いや審査員の特徴における性別差が観察されたにもかかわらず,原稿の受け入れ率は,著者または編集者の性別によって有意に影響されなかった.

結論:

編集者およびレビュー者の行動にはジェンダーの違いがあるが,それが最終的な出版決定に影響を与えるようには見えなかった.
1991年のJAMAのピアレビュープロセスは,受験者受け入れ率に影響を与えることなく,ジェンダーの違いを示した.

さらに関連する動画

09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement (PMSM), for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

06:24

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies

Published on: January 10, 2025

関連する概念動画

00:46

Feedback Inhibition

Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!

01:46

Types of Selection

Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...

01:31

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?

01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...

01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

01:17

Correspondence Bias

Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of...

関連する実験動画