Abstract
Gene-based burden tests are a popular and powerful approach for analysis of exome-wide association studies. These approaches combine sets of variants within a gene into a single burden score that is then tested for association. Typically, a range of burden scores are calculated and tested across a range of annotation classes and frequency bins. Correlation between these tests can complicate the multiple testing correction and hamper interpretation of the results. We introduce a method called the sparse burden association test (SBAT) that tests the joint set of burden scores under the assumption that causal burden scores act in the same effect direction. The method simultaneously assesses the significance of the model fit and selects the set of burden scores that best explain the association at the same time. Using simulated data, we show that the method is well calibrated and highlight scenarios where the test outperforms existing gene-based tests. We apply the method to 73 quantitative traits from the UK Biobank, showing that SBAT is a valuable additional gene-based test when combined with other existing approaches. This test is implemented in the REGENIE software.
