确定何时应考虑质量改进举措研究:建议的标准和潜在的影响
D Casarett1, J H Karlawish, J Sugarman
1Institute of Aging, University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics and the Division of Geriatrics, Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 19104, USA. casarett@mail.med.upenn.edu
确定质量改善举措是否是研究对于患者保护至关重要. 两个关键标准 - - 缺乏直接的患者益处,并对可通用性施加额外的风险 - - 有助于区分研究与非研究质量改进.
科学领域:
- 医疗保健服务研究 医疗服务研究
- 医学伦理 医学伦理
- 医疗保健政策 医疗保健政策
背景情况:
- 质量改进 (QI) 计划在医疗保健中很普遍,旨在产生更好的患者护理知识.
- 在QI和研究之间存在关键区别,影响监管监督和人类受试者保护.
- 当前关于人类受试者保护的规定适用于如果一个QI倡议被归类为研究.
研究的目的:
- 提出明确的标准来确定何时质量改进倡议应该被审查和规范为研究.
- 确保参与医疗保健质量改善活动的人体受试者的适当保护.
主要方法:
- 这篇文章提出了两个具体的标准来区分研究与非研究的智商.
- 标准1:评估是否预计大多数参与患者将直接受益于所获得的知识.
- 标准2:评估是否需要额外的风险或负担以提高结果的概括性.
主要成果:
- 满足任何一个标准的倡议都应该受到研究法规的约束.
- 该框架旨在保护QI倡议参与者的权利和利益.
- 区分研究确保遵守保护人类受试者的联邦法规.
结论:
- 实施这些标准为QI计划的分类提供了一个明确的途径.
- 这种分类对于维护医疗保健改进中的伦理标准和监管合规性至关重要.
- 保护质量改善举措的参与者至关重要.
更多相关视频
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
相关概念视频
Ethics in Research
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Quality Assurance
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
