Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...
Chi-square Analysis02:46

Chi-square Analysis

The chi-square test is a statistical hypothesis test. It is used to check whether there is a significant difference between an expected value and an observed value. In the context of genetics, it enables us to either accept or reject a hypothesis, based on how much the observed values deviate from the expected values.
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...
Synthetic Biology02:55

Synthetic Biology

Synthetic biology is an interdisciplinary science that involves using principles from disciplines such as engineering, molecular biology, cell biology, and systems biology. It involves remodeling existing organisms from nature or constructing completely new synthetic organisms for applications such as protein or enzyme production, bioremediation, value-added macromolecule production, and the addition of desirable traits to crops, to name a few.
Golden rice
Golden rice is a genetically modified...

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Overcoming the research to policy gap.

The Lancet. Global health·2019
Same author

India and Pakistan: a plea for sanity.

Lancet (London, England)·2019
Same author

Offline: Has global health lost it?

Lancet (London, England)·2019
Same author

Offline: UK citizens are losing the right to health-who cares?

Lancet (London, England)·2019
Same author

Offline: General practice-changing the laws of nature.

Lancet (London, England)·2019
Same author

Countdown Global Mental Health 2030.

Lancet (London, England)·2019
Same journal

Online Prescribing of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

Using AI Disagreement to Expose Gaps in Coverage Rules.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

Randomized Trials in Pregnancy.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

Randomized Trials in Pregnancy-Reply.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

WHO Issues Guidelines for Treating Ebola and Marburg Viruses.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

FDA Approves Additional Naloxone Nasal Spray for Opioid Overdose.

JAMA·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: May 12, 2026

Method Development for Contactless Resonant Cavity Dielectric Spectroscopic Studies of Cellulosic Paper
05:40

Method Development for Contactless Resonant Cavity Dielectric Spectroscopic Studies of Cellulosic Paper

Published on: October 4, 2019

隐藏的研究论文

Richard Horton1

  • 1The Lancet, 32 Jamestown Rd, London NW1 78Y, England. richard.horton@lancet.com

JAMA
|June 1, 2002
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

研究论文往往无法代表科学家的真实意见,排除了批判性的见解和不同的观点. 这项研究强调了需要进行结构化的讨论,以提高科学报告的准确性.

关键词:
生物医学和行为研究研究.经验方法的实证方法.

更多相关视频

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement (PMSM), for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement (PMSM), for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

Uncovering Hidden Dynamics of Natural Photonic Structures Using Holographic Imaging
05:45

Uncovering Hidden Dynamics of Natural Photonic Structures Using Holographic Imaging

Published on: March 31, 2022

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Method Development for Contactless Resonant Cavity Dielectric Spectroscopic Studies of Cellulosic Paper
05:40

Method Development for Contactless Resonant Cavity Dielectric Spectroscopic Studies of Cellulosic Paper

Published on: October 4, 2019

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement (PMSM), for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement (PMSM), for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

Uncovering Hidden Dynamics of Natural Photonic Structures Using Holographic Imaging
05:45

Uncovering Hidden Dynamics of Natural Photonic Structures Using Holographic Imaging

Published on: March 31, 2022

科学领域:

  • 医学研究 医学研究
  • 科学出版 科研出版
  • 研究诚信研究诚信

背景情况:

  • 评估发表的研究结果的准确性,作为贡献者意见的代表.
  • 调查所述发现与作者共识之间的潜在差异.

研究的目的:

  • 确定研究论文是否准确地反映了贡献者对报告的研究的意见.
  • 识别科学出版物中被排除的批评或模糊的含义的例子.

主要方法:

  • 从10篇"柳叶刀"杂志的10篇研究文章中对54位贡献者的调查答复进行了定性分析.
  • 对研究相关问题的贡献者答案与已发表的研究报告进行比较.

主要成果:

  • 67%的贡献者回应了;许多人承认在论文中没有出现的弱点.
  • 有关发现的重要性和影响的贡献者之间存在重大分歧.
  • 发表的报告往往排除了各种贡献者的意见,缺乏系统的讨论.

结论:

  • 研究论文很少捕捉到贡献者的观点的全部范围.
  • 证据表明,科学著作中存在自我审查的批评和模糊的含义.
  • 建议有结构的讨论部分和探索方法,以包括贡献者的多元性.