Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Selection Bias in Psychedelic Research: Comparing Self-Reported Quality-Of-Life Impact Between Enthusiasts and a General Population Sample.

Journal of psychoactive drugs·2026
Same author

Neural commonalities and dissociations of human social and experiential learning.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same author

Perceptual discrepancies in the experience and reporting of violence against children are more pronounced among social workers compared to laypeople.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Generative AI-assisted clinical interviewing of mental health.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Question-based computational language approach outperform ratings scale in discriminating between anxiety and depression.

Journal of anxiety disorders·2025
Same author

The rise of artificial intelligence for cognitive behavioral therapy: A bibliometric overview.

Applied psychology. Health and well-being·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

在一个简单的决策任务中,未能检测出意图和结果之间的不匹配.

Petter Johansson1, Lars Hall, Sverker Sikström

  • 1Lund University Cognitive Science, Lund University, Kungshuset Lundagård, 222 22 Lund, Sweden.

Science (New York, N.Y.)
|October 8, 2005
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

人们往往没有注意到当他们的选择被换成另一个结果时,但他们仍然自信地解释了他们最初的决定. 这种"选择盲"挑战了关于决策和内省的假设.

更多相关视频

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

科学领域:

  • 认知心理学 认知心理学
  • 神经科学是一个神经科学.
  • 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.

背景情况:

  • 决策理论假设个人发现意图与结果不匹配.
  • 行为调整和适应被认为是对错误的基本反应.

研究的目的:

  • 研究意图,选择和内省之间的关系.
  • 检查个人是否发现他们的选择与经验结果之间的不匹配.
  • 探索自省在错误发生时的决策中的作用.

主要方法:

  • 参与者在呈现的面孔对之间做出了基于吸引力的选择.
  • 秘密操纵了选择和经验结果之间的关系.
  • 参与者被要求提供他们选择的内观理由.

主要成果:

  • 参与者经常没有注意到他们预期的选择和经历的结果之间的明显不匹配.
  • 尽管没有被注意到的不匹配,但参与者很乐意为他们的选择提供了自我审视的理由.
  • 这种现象被称为"选择盲".

结论:

  • 这项研究揭示了选择,结果和意识之间的显著断开.
  • 内省可能不会准确地反映出选择的真实基础,特别是当涉及错误时.
  • 选择失明挑战了决策过程中自省的假设准确性.