Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Nuclear reactor safety.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1985
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 12, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

关于科学和社会的文章:测谎仪测试和美国能源部国家实验室.

S Aftergood

    Science (New York, N.Y.)
    |August 31, 2007
    PubMed
    概括

    一项新的安全政策要求美国国家实验室进行测谎仪测试,引发了关于其科学有效性和对实验室活力的潜在影响的辩论. 反对者质疑测谎仪的使用.

    科学领域:

    • 国家安全国家安全.
    • 法医科学 法医科学 法医科学
    • 公共政策 公共政策

    背景情况:

    • 美国国会最近颁布了一项命令,要求美国国家实验室的员工接受测谎仪测试.
    • 该政策是在这些设施内发现的安全漏洞后颁布的.
    • 该任务引发了大量的争议和辩论.

    研究的目的:

    • 探讨围绕美国国家实验室新的测谎仪测试政策的争议.
    • 检查政策的支持者和反对者提出的论点.
    • 评估政策对科学界和研究诚信的潜在影响.

    主要方法:

    • 这篇文章回顾了现有的文献和政策文件.
    • 它分析了有关测谎仪技术科学有效性的论点.
    • 它考虑了对国家实验室的潜在社会经济和运营影响.

    主要成果:

    • 测谎仪的科学有效性受到反对者的质疑.
    • 人们担心这项政策可能会破坏国家实验室的运营效率和士气.
    • 该政策的实施引发了关于平衡安全需求与科学自由的问题.

    结论:

    更多相关视频

    Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
    07:32

    Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

    Published on: February 10, 2016

    A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
    08:33

    A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

    Published on: September 4, 2019

    相关实验视频

    Last Updated: Jul 12, 2026

    An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
    07:36

    An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

    Published on: May 3, 2016

    Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
    07:32

    Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

    Published on: February 10, 2016

    A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
    08:33

    A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

    Published on: September 4, 2019

    • 这场争议凸显了国家安全要求和科学研究原则之间的紧张关系.
    • 在这种情况下,需要进一步研究测谎仪测试的有效性和影响.
    • 对美国国家实验室的活力和生产力的长期影响仍然是一个重大问题.