Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Punnett Squares01:00

Punnett Squares

Overview
Competition02:34

Competition

When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.Intraspecific competition, which occurs between individuals of the same species, serves as a natural mechanism for regulating population size. Too much...
Milgram's Obedience to Authority02:20

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
Punnett Squares01:00

Punnett Squares

Overview
Punishment01:27

Punishment

Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Representativeness and response validity across nine opt-in online samples.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Scientific workflow in experimental economics.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
Same author

2D:4D and Self-Employment: A Preregistered Replication Study in a Large General Population Sample.

Entrepreneurship theory and practice·2026
Same author

Publisher Correction: Reproducibility and robustness of economics and political science research.

Nature·2026
Same author

Integrative experiments identify how punishment affects welfare in public goods games.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same journal

Six ways to put the public at the heart of science and policy.

Nature·2026
Same journal

The complex truth about trust in science.

Nature·2026
Same journal

Have people stopped trusting science? The data tell a surprising story.

Nature·2026
Same journal

How FAIR data are helping to build trust in science.

Nature·2026
Same journal

Scientists should recognize their own political biases to build public trust.

Nature·2026
Same journal

Harmonizing standards and resources for the medical genome.

Nature·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 6, 2026

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

获胜者不会惩罚他们.

Anna Dreber1, David G Rand, Drew Fudenberg

  • 1Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.

Nature
|March 21, 2008
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

昂贵的惩罚增加了重复游戏中的合作,但并没有改善小组回报. 总回报最高的个人倾向于避免昂贵的惩罚,这表明在合作场景中可能是不适应的.

更多相关视频

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
05:25

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise

Published on: March 29, 2019

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2026

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
05:25

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise

Published on: March 29, 2019

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

科学领域:

  • 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
  • 社会心理学 社会心理学
  • 游戏理论 游戏理论

背景情况:

  • 合作是人类行为的基础,涉及个人和团体利益之间的权衡.
  • 昂贵的惩罚,即个人为了惩罚他人而付出代价,被假设是为了加强合作.
  • 昂贵的惩罚在与声誉影响的反复相互作用中的作用仍然不太了解.

研究的目的:

  • 调查昂贵的惩罚对重复游戏环境中的合作的影响.
  • 为了确定昂贵的惩罚是否会影响群体回报和个人结果.
  • 分析惩罚行为与合作游戏中的整体成功之间的关系.

主要方法:

  • 使用重复游戏模拟的实验经济学.
  • 参与者在每一轮选择合作,叛逃和昂贵的惩罚.
  • 对照组没有选择昂贵的惩罚.

主要成果:

  • 昂贵的惩罚的可用性显著提高了观察到的合作水平.
  • 随着昂贵的惩罚的选择,平均群体回报并没有得到改善.
  • 在总回报和使用昂贵的惩罚之间发现了强烈的负相关性;'赢家'没有惩罚.

结论:

  • 昂贵的惩罚可以促进在重复互动中的合作,但在进化上可能不有利于最大限度地提高个人或团体的收益.
  • "胜利者不惩罚"的行为表明,在某些合作环境中,昂贵的惩罚可能是不适应的.
  • 需要进一步的研究来了解代价高昂的惩罚的进化起源和具体功能,而不仅仅是简单的合作游戏.