缺乏营养的湖泊生态系统的光限制
Jan Karlsson1, Pär Byström, Jenny Ask
1Climate Impacts Research Centre, Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, Box 62, SE-981 07 Abisko, Sweden. Jan.Karlsson@emg.umu.se
Nature
|July 24, 2009
概括
在许多小的,缺乏营养的湖泊中,来自陆地的有色有机物限制了光线,控制了生物质的生产. 这挑战了传统的观点,即营养是湖泊生产力的首要驱动力.
科学领域:
- 生态生态学 生态生态学
- 临界技术 临界技术
- 环境科学 环境科学
背景情况:
- 生态系统的生产率,即生物质合成的速度,对于生态系统的功能和管理至关重要.
- 营养素的可用性一直是控制湖泊生态系统生产力的既定范式.
- 小型,营养不良的湖泊占全球湖泊生态系统的大多数.
研究的目的:
- 评估营养限制范式对小,营养贫乏的湖泊的相关性.
- 为了研究有色有机物在控制湖泊生产力的作用.
- 了解光衰减如何影响生物质合成和更高的热量水平.
主要方法:
- 沿着水色梯度的小型非生产性湖泊的比较.
- 评估有色陆地有机物对光衰减的影响.
- 对盆地初级生产,无脊椎动物和鱼类的影响评估.
主要成果:
- 彩色有机物通过影响光衰减,显著控制地原始产量.
- 这种控制扩展到盆地无脊椎动物和鱼类的生产和生物量.
- 这些发现与营养供应主要决定湖泊生产力的范式相矛盾.
结论:
- 由有色有机物驱动的光限制是许多非生产性湖泊的关键因素,而不是营养限制.
- 陆地碳循环和有机物质出口的变化将对湖泊生态系统产生重大影响.
- 结果对了解湖泊生态系统的功能和对环境变化的反应有影响.
更多相关视频
12:24Laboratory Estimation of Net Trophic Transfer Efficiencies of PCB Congeners to Lake Trout Salvelinus namaycush from Its Prey
Published on: August 29, 2014
10.3K
06:02A Low-Cost Method of Measuring the In Situ Primary Productivity of Periphyton Communities of Lentic Waters
Published on: December 16, 2022
2.0K
相关概念视频
Primary Production
20.4K
The total amount of energy acquired by primary producers in an ecosystem is called gross primary production (GPP). However, of this energy, producers use some for metabolic processes, and some is lost as heat, decreasing the amount of energy available to the next trophic level. The remaining usable amount of energy is called the net primary productivity (NPP). In terrestrial ecosystems, NPP is driven by climate, while light penetration and nutrient availability drive NPP in aquatic ecosystems.
20.4K
Trophic Efficiency
19.5K
Trophic level transfer efficiency (TLTE) is a measure of the total energy transfer from one trophic level to the next. Due to extensive energy loss as metabolic heat, an average of only 10% of the original energy obtained is passed on to the next level. This pattern of energy loss severely limits the possible number of trophic levels in a food chain.
19.5K
Microbial Interactions: Competition
87
Microbial competition is an ecological interaction in which microorganisms vie for limited resources within shared environments. These resources may include nutrients, space, or light, depending on the system. The intensity and outcome of competition are influenced by the environmental context, such as nutrient availability, spatial constraints, and the diversity of microbial species present. These competitive interactions significantly influence the structure, function, and resilience of...
87
Marine Microbial Ecology
66
Marine microbial ecosystems are shaped by distinct physicochemical limits, including high salinity, low nutrient availability, and fluctuating oxygen levels. These conditions favor smaller microbial cell sizes, which maximize their surface-to-volume ratio for efficient nutrient uptake.Microbial activity and community composition are closely linked to biogeochemical cycles, particularly in dynamic environments like estuaries, where halotolerant microbes thrive in response to variable salinity...
66
Deep Sea Microbial Ecology
53
The deep ocean and its underlying sediments represent vast, largely unexplored microbial habitats that extend far beyond the sunlit photic zone. The photic (euphotic) zone typically spans the upper ~100–200 meters of pelagic waters in the open ocean, but its depth varies geographically and seasonally, where sufficient light supports photosynthetic life. Below this lies the deep sea, spanning roughly 1000–6000 meters (bathypelagic to abyssal zones), with deeper hadal trenches...
53
Freshwater Microbial Ecology
58
Freshwater systems such as streams, rivers, and lakes exhibit distinct physical and biological characteristics that influence their microbial communities. These environments are broadly categorized into lotic systems—those with flowing waters like streams and most rivers—and lentic systems, which include still or slow-moving waters such as lakes, ponds, and marshes.In lentic systems, phytoplankton drive primary production, generating autochthonous organic carbon. In contrast, lotic...
58
