Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
Obedience01:08

Obedience

According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation, obedience...
Milgram's Obedience to Authority02:20

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
Deindividuation00:57

Deindividuation

Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

US budget 'freezes' spending on research.

Nature·2018
Same author

Scientists should not resign themselves to Brexit.

Nature·2017
Same author

The elephant in the room we can't ignore.

Nature·2016
Same author

Time to cry out for academic freedom.

Nature·2015
Same author

Rejection of GM crops is not a failure for science.

Nature·2015
Same author

The future of science will soon be upon us.

Nature·2015

相关实验视频

Updated: May 12, 2026

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

科学不当行为:更多的警察,更多的强盗?

Colin Macilwain

    Cell
    |June 26, 2012
    PubMed
    概括

    科学界正在解决以前被低估的研究不当行为. 扩大定义可能为最小化和监督科学诚信提供解决方案.

    科学领域:

    • 科学完整性 科学完整性
    • 研究伦理学研究伦理学
    • 学术不当行为学术不当行为

    背景情况:

    • 从历史上看,研究不当行为被认为是太罕见,不值得重视.
    • 科学界现在正在积极寻找方法来尽量减少和警方调查不当行为.
    • 人们越来越认识到需要强大的系统来维护科学标准.

    研究的目的:

    • 探索科学界内减少和监管研究不当行为的策略.
    • 调查扩大研究不当行为的定义作为一个关键战略的潜力.
    • 评估重新定义研究不当行为对科学实践和监督的影响.

    主要方法:

    • 本研究涉及对现有的研究不当行为的定义进行概念分析.
    • 它检查了扩大这些定义对检测和预防的潜在影响.
    • 该研究考虑了政策影响和社区对定义变化的反应.

    主要成果:

    • 扩大研究不当行为的定义可以提高其可检测性和可测量性.
    • 更广泛的范围可能会鼓励采取更积极的措施来打击科学错误和欺诈.
    • 这种方法可以促进一个更严格和负责任的研究环境.

    更多相关视频

    Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
    09:49

    Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

    Published on: December 24, 2015

    An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
    07:36

    An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

    Published on: May 3, 2016

    相关实验视频

    Last Updated: May 12, 2026

    The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
    09:12

    The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

    Published on: July 4, 2013

    Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
    09:49

    Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

    Published on: December 24, 2015

    An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
    07:36

    An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

    Published on: May 3, 2016

    结论:

    • 扩大研究不当行为的定义是改善监督的可行策略.
    • 积极的警务和最小化努力对于保持公众对科学的信任至关重要.
    • 对构成不当行为的重新评估对于科学诚信的未来至关重要.