Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Archival Research01:40

Archival Research

15.6K
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
15.6K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.7K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.7K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

596
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
596
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

627
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
627
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

11.6K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
11.6K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

2.6K
2.6K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Development and acceptability of gist-based decision aids for prostate and breast cancer screening: a two-phase qualitative interview study in an online setting.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Measurement of ethnicity in clinical trials: Delphi survey and consensus statement.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

Patient Engagement With an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool Evaluating Hospital Discharge Readiness After Cancer Surgery.

JCO oncology practice·2026
Same author

Nerve Blocks for Mastectomy with Reconstruction: Reply.

Anesthesiology·2026
Same author

Protocol for a SPIRIT extension for reporting pragmatic and explanatory trial protocols designed using the PRECIS tool (SPIRIT-PRECIS).

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.

Lancet (London, England)·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: May 4, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

14.4K

增加价值和减少浪费:解决难以获得的研究问题

An-Wen Chan1, Fujian Song2, Andrew Vickers3

  • 1Women's College Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Lancet (London, England)
|January 14, 2014
PubMed
概括

卫生研究的传播很差,对协议,报告和数据的访问有限. 这导致浪费投资和偏见的结果,损害患者护理和研究进展.

更多相关视频

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms
10:41

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms

Published on: May 9, 2017

9.9K
Harvesting and Disaggregation: An Overlooked Step in Biofilm Methods Research
13:25

Harvesting and Disaggregation: An Overlooked Step in Biofilm Methods Research

Published on: April 22, 2022

4.1K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

14.4K
Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms
10:41

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms

Published on: May 9, 2017

9.9K
Harvesting and Disaggregation: An Overlooked Step in Biofilm Methods Research
13:25

Harvesting and Disaggregation: An Overlooked Step in Biofilm Methods Research

Published on: April 22, 2022

4.1K

科学领域:

  • 卫生研究 卫生研究 卫生研究
  • 生物医学研究生物医学研究
  • 临床试验 临床试验

背景情况:

  • 卫生研究文档包括协议,完整的报告和数据集.
  • 这些基本文件很少可用,导致信息不完整.
  • 期刊报道往往是选择性报道和不完整的,阻碍了研究的可复制性.

研究的目的:

  • 要突出难以获得的健康研究数据的关键问题.
  • 为了强调数据传播不良的负面后果.
  • 提出系统解决方案,以提高研究透明度和数据共享.

主要方法:

  • 这项研究是对健康研究文档和传播当前实践的审查和分析.
  • 它检查了研究方案的可用性和质量,完整的研究报告和参与者级数据集.
  • 它确定了系统性障碍,并提出了可行的建议.

主要成果:

  • 协议,完整的研究报告和参与者级数据集很少可访问.
  • 现有的期刊报告因选择性报道和方法遗漏而受到影响.
  • 不完整的数据访问导致数十亿美元的浪费投资,并引入了偏见.

结论:

  • 学术机构和资助者必须激励充分传播研究.
  • 制定和采用严格的协议,报告和数据共享标准至关重要.
  • 期刊,资助者和监管机构应执行研究登记和数据可用性的政策.