来自目标库分析和机器学习的基础编辑结果的决定因素
Mandana Arbab1, Max W Shen2, Beverly Mok1
1Merkin Institute of Transformative Technologies in Healthcare, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Cell
|June 14, 2020
概括
这项研究介绍了BE-Hive,一种预测基准编辑结果和效率的机器学习模型. 它可以精确地纠正与疾病相关的突变,并开发改进的基准编辑器.
科学领域:
- 遗传学和基因组学
- 生物技术
- 生物信息学
背景情况:
- 基准编辑器对于目标点突变至关重要,但它们的编辑决定因素仍然不清楚.
- 了解序列-活动关系是优化基础编辑工具的关键.
- 哺乳动物细胞系统为基因编辑结果提供了一个强大的平台.
研究的目的:
- 描述细胞因子和腺因基编辑器 (CBEs和ABEs) 的序列活性关系.
- 开发一个可预测的机器学习模型 (BE-Hive) 来实现基础编辑结果和效率.
- 设计具有增强功能的新型基础编辑器.
主要方法:
- 在哺乳动物细胞中对38,538个集成点进行11个基因编辑器的全基因组表征.
- 使用实验基础编辑数据训练机器学习模型 (BE-Hive).
- 在 silico 预测和编辑结果的实验验证,包括旁观者编辑.
主要成果:
- BE-Hive准确地预测基因编辑的基因型结果 (R ≈ 0.9) 和效率 (R ≈ 0.7).
- 成功纠正了3388个与疾病相关的单核酸变体 (SNVs).
- 鉴定了C-to-G和C-to-A编辑的新决定因素,使174种致病转变SNV的纠正成为可能.
- 设计了具有调节编辑能力的新CBE变种.
结论:
- BE-Hive显著提升了基础编辑的可预测性和精度.
- 这项研究将基础编辑的范围扩展到以前难以解决的目标,包括转换.
- 新的基础编辑器提供了更好的编辑性能和控制,为治疗应用铺平了道路.
相关概念视频
RNA Editing
9.6K
RNA editing is a post-transcriptional modification where a precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) nucleotide sequence is changed by base insertion, deletion, or modification. The extent of RNA editing varies from a few hundred bases, in mitochondrial DNA of trypanosomes, to a just single base, in nuclear genes of mammals. Even a single base change in the pre-mRNA can convert a codon for one amino acid into the codon for another amino acid or a stop codon. This type of re-coding can significantly affect the...
9.6K
Long-patch Base Excision Repair
7.7K
Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
7.7K
Improving Translational Accuracy
13.9K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
13.9K


