一个因果测试的弱联系的强度
Karthik Rajkumar1, Guillaume Saint-Jacques1, Iavor Bojinov2
1LinkedIn Corporation, 700 E Middlefield Rd, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA.
概括
在LinkedIn上,弱势关系可以促进就业流动性, 但这种影响是非线性的, 温和的关系往往会产生最好的结果.
科学领域:
- 社会网络分析
- 劳动经济学
- 社会学
背景情况:
- "弱势关系的强度"理论认为,较弱的社会联系可以促进人们获得新的机会.
- 了解像LinkedIn这样的专业网络中的弱点关系对于职业流动至关重要.
- 之前的研究主要依赖于观察数据,缺乏因果证据.
研究的目的:
- 通过实验研究弱联系对LinkedIn专业网络中的就业流动性的因果关系.
- 在大规模的数字环境中测试弱链理论的细微差别.
- 找出缓解劳动力强度与就业流动性之间的关系的因素.
主要方法:
- 分析了大规模的随机实验,
- 在用户网络中操纵弱链的普遍性.
- 追踪新的联系方式和职位转换.
主要成果:
- 实验证据证实,弱势关系增加了就业流动性,支持弱势关系理论的实力.
- 观察到一个反向的U型关系:弱势关系增加了就业流动性,随后的回报率下降.
- 较弱的联系对就业流动的影响各不相同:中等弱的联系 (通过相互联系) 和最弱的联系 (通过互动强度) 对就业流动的影响最大.
- 发现了行业差异:在数字化行业中较弱的联系更有效,而在数字化程度较低的行业中较强的联系更有利.
结论:
- 弱势关系的强度是不线性的,并表现出边际回报的减少.
- 联系强度 (互动强度与相互联系) 的定义和测量对工作流动性产生重大影响.
- 在促进就业流动方面,弱或强联系的有效性取决于环境,因行业数字化而有所不同.
相关概念视频
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
462
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
462
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
549
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
549
Cause and Effect
11.1K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
11.1K
Relationship Formation
40.7K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.7K
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test
972
Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates...
Spearman's test calculates...
972
Correlation and Causation
38.4K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
38.4K


