在Cu3(BTC)2上增强气体吸附金属有机框架,通过合成后的酸交换和计算分析进行计算分析
José M Veleta1, Roy A Arrieta1, Yanyu Wu1
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79968, United States.
Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids
|June 2, 2023
概括
金属有机框架 (MOF) 的合成后修改增强了气体吸附. 在HKUST-1类型的MOF中,特别是Cu3(BTC) 2中,通过创建结构缺陷,改善了CO2吸收.
科学领域:
- 材料科学 材料科学 材料科学
- 化学 化学 化学
- 纳米技术 纳米技术
背景情况:
- 金属有机框架 (MOF) 是具有可调节性质的多孔材料.
- HKUST-1 (Cu3(BTC) 2) 是一个众所周知的MOF,在气体储存中具有应用.
- 合成后修改提供了一条进一步提高MOF性能的途径.
研究的目的:
- 调查阴离子交换对HKUST-1.1气体吸附性质的影响.
- 通过合成后的修改来探索MOF属性的可调性.
- 确定离子交换的最佳条件,以最大限度地增加气体吸附.
主要方法:
- 通过与TM2+ (Mn,Fe,Co,Ni) 溶液进行阴离子交换,对Cu3(BTC) 2进行合成后的修饰.
- 使用粉末X射线衍射,FTIR,ICP-OES和SEM进行表征.
- 气体吸附测量 (CO2) 和表面积分析.
主要成果:
- 实现了Cu节点的部分替换,保留了MOF晶体结构.
- 铁和显示显著的转移 (高达39%和18%),而Mn和Ni显示低的交换 (2.40%和2.02%).
- (Cu/Mn) 3 (BTC) 2表现出最高的二氧化碳吸附能力 (5.47 mmol/g),比原始Cu3 (BTC) 2 (3.08 mmol/g) 显著增加.
- 增加的气体吸附与在阴离子交换期间引入的结构缺陷相关.
结论:
- 合成后的阴离子交换是调整MOF属性的有效策略.
- 缺陷的形成在提高气体吸附能力方面起着至关重要的作用.
- 这种方法为优化现有MOF架构的特定应用提供了一种通用方法.
更多相关视频
10:44Preparation of Biomass-based Mesoporous Carbon with Higher Nitrogen-/Oxygen-chelating Adsorption for CuII Through Microwave Pre-Pyrolysis
Published on: February 12, 2019
10.0K
04:51Author Spotlight: Functionalizing Metal-Organic Frameworks: Advancements, Challenges, and the Power of Post-Synthetic Ligand Exchange
Published on: June 23, 2023
3.0K
相关概念视频
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
26.9K
Crystal Field Theory
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
26.9K
Extraction: Advanced Methods
497
Metal ions can be separated from one another by complexation with organic ligands–the chelating agent– to form uncharged chelates. Here, the chelating agent must contain hydrophobic groups and behave as a weak acid, losing a proton to bind with the metal. Since most organic ligands used in this process are insoluble or undergo oxidation in the aqueous phase, the chelating agent is initially added to the organic phase and extracted into the aqueous phase. The metal-ligand complex is...
497
Valence Bond Theory
8.9K
Coordination compounds and complexes exhibit different colors, geometries, and magnetic behavior, depending on the metal atom/ion and ligands from which they are composed. In an attempt to explain the bonding and structure of coordination complexes, Linus Pauling proposed the valence bond theory, or VBT, using the concepts of hybridization and the overlapping of the atomic orbitals. According to VBT, the central metal atom or ion (Lewis acid) hybridizes to provide empty orbitals of suitable...
8.9K
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
43.2K
Tetrahedral Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
43.2K
