在电治疗中模拟视野的影响 电流流动模拟
Alexander Guillen1, Christopher C Abbott2, Zhi-De Deng3
1Research and Development, Soterix Medical, Woodbridge, NJ, United States.
Frontiers in psychiatry
|June 5, 2023
概括
视野 (FOV) 显著影响电治疗 (ECT) 模拟. 双边 (BL) ECT模型比右边单边 (RUL) ECT对FOV限制更敏感,这表明全头MRI数据对于准确的BL模拟至关重要.
科学领域:
- 医疗成像医学成像
- 计算神经科学是一种神经科学.
- 神经调节是一种神经调节.
背景情况:
- 电疗法 (ECT) 的MRI引导前模型受到收集的视野 (FOV) 的限制.
- 在ECT模拟中使用不同的模型范围,可能会影响结果.
- 本研究研究了FOV对右侧单边 (RUL) 和双边 (BL) 电极放置的电场 (E-field) 分布的影响.
研究的目的:
- 检查不同磁共振成像 (MRI) 视野 (FOV) 范围对电治疗 (ECT) 模拟中的诱导电场 (E-field) 的影响.
- 为了比较右侧单边 (RUL) 和双边 (BL) 电极放置对FOV变化的灵敏度.
- 为了确定准确的ECT建模所需的最低FOV.
主要方法:
- 一个全身数据集被处理,以创建不同范围的模型,从头部到干.
- 相对误差 (RE) 是通过将每个程度的刺激强度与全身参考模型进行比较来计算的.
- 使用2D和3D空间图片可视化电子场分布并评估刺激指标.
主要成果:
- 双边 (BL) ECT模拟显示了较高的相对误差 (~50%) 与头部FOV,减少到~2%与部FOV.
- 右侧单边 (RUL) ECT模拟的相对误差较小 (~5%),上部头部FOV,降至0.28%的全头FOV.
- BL刺激覆盖了更大的大脑体积,但仅限于头部,而RUL诱导的体积在更高的幅度时更大,特别是在考虑具有更大的FOV的BL模型中的电流损失时.
结论:
- 双边 (BL) ECT建模比右边单边 (RUL) 建模更容易受到视野 (FOV) 的限制.
- 对于BL ECT模拟,建议使用全头MRI数据,可能需要更大的FOV.
- 由于大脑体积刺激更大,BL ECT更有效的假设需要重新评估,考虑到FOV影响和潜在的电流损失.
相关概念视频
Electroconvulsive Therapy
80
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), or shock therapy, remains a critical biomedical intervention for severe, treatment-resistant depression. While its origins can be traced back to Hippocrates' observations that malaria-induced convulsions alleviated mental illness, modern ECT has evolved significantly from its earlier, more primitive applications. First introduced in 1938 by Ugo Cerletti and his colleagues, ECT involves inducing controlled seizures using electrical currents. In its early...
80
Induced Electric Fields: Applications
1.7K
An important distinction exists between the electric field induced by a changing magnetic field and the electrostatic field produced by a fixed charge distribution. Specifically, the induced electric field is nonconservative because it does not work in moving a charge over a closed path. In contrast, the electrostatic field is conservative and does no net work over a closed path. Hence, electric potential can be associated with the electrostatic field but not the induced field. The following...
1.7K


