反事实和因果选择的逻辑
Tadeg Quillien1, Christopher G Lucas1
1School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh.
Psychological review
|June 8, 2023
概括
人们通过心理模拟替代场景来直观地识别原因. 这种反事实模拟理论解释了我们如何从许多贡献因素中选择特定的原因,专注于可能和相似的可能性.
科学领域:
- 认知科学 认知科学
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 因果推理因果推理
背景情况:
- 人类很容易地做出因果判断,尽管存在许多因素.
- 从多种可能性中选择一个特定的原因仍然是一个复杂的认知过程.
研究的目的:
- 研究人类因果判断背后的认知机制.
- 提出和验证因果直觉的反事实理论.
主要方法:
- 重新分析有关因果判断的现有经验数据.
- 进行新的实验来测试反事实理论.
- 检查关于反事实模拟和相关性的假设.
主要成果:
- 反事实理论独特地解释了人类的因果直觉.
- 人们模拟的反事实可能性是先验可能和类似于实际事件.
- 因果判断与一个因素和一个效应在模拟可能性之间的关系相关.
结论:
- 反事实模拟是人类因果推理的一个关键机制.
- 该理论为人们如何识别原因提供了强有力的解释.
- 这种认知模型增强了我们对决策和解决问题的理解.
相关概念视频
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
387
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
387
Causality in Epidemiology
509
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
509
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
360
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
360
Cause and Effect
11.0K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
11.0K
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
8.4K
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
8.4K
Correlation and Causation
37.8K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
37.8K


