质子同位素特异性离子分子激素反应
Oisin J Shiels1, Samuel J P Marlton1, Adam J Trevitt1
1Molecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong 2522, New South Wales, Australia.
Journal of the American Chemical Society
|June 20, 2023
概括
基纳的质子位点变化显著改变了基因与乙烯的反应性. 通过空间静电效应,而不是直接结合,解释这些差异,需要先进的量子化学方法进行分析.
科学领域:
- 物理化学
- 化学动力学
- 计算化学
背景情况:
- 迪斯顿基离子是各种化学过程中的关键中间体.
- 了解质子化位点对反应活性的影响对于阐明反应机制至关重要.
- 气相研究提供了一个简单的环境来隔离特定的化学效应.
研究的目的:
- 用乙烯独立测量纳阳离子质化异构体的气相反应动力学.
- 调查质子位变异对激素反应性的影响.
- 阐明这些反应性差异的基本因素,特别是静电效应.
主要方法:
- 使用离子流动性过来分离质子化异构体.
- 激光配备的四极离子陷质谱仪使运动测量成为可能.
- 使用双混合密度函数理论进行理论计算.
主要成果:
- 对两个质子化异构体观察到不同的气相反应动力学.
- 质子化位点的变化导致基因对乙烯的反应性发生显著变化.
- 通过空间的静电相互作用被确定为反应率差异的主要驱动因素.
结论:
- 基纳酸上的质子定位对其激素的反应性有深远的影响.
- 通过空间相互作用介导的静电效应对于确定反应结果至关重要.
- 需要先进的计算方法来准确地建模和解释这些激进反应的远程效应.
相关概念视频
Radical Reactivity: Electrophilic Radicals
1.9K
Radicals adjacent to electron‐withdrawing groups are called electrophilic radicals. These radicals readily react with nucleophilic alkenes. For example, the malonate radical, in which the radical center is flanked by two electron‐withdrawing groups, reacts readily with butyl vinyl ether, which consists of an electron‐donating oxygen substituent. The reaction between electrophilic malonate radical and nucleophilic vinyl ether is favored because the radical has a...
1.9K
Radical Reactivity: Overview
2.1K
Radicals, the highly reactive species, gain stability by undergoing three different reactions. The first reaction involves a radical-radical coupling, in which a radical combines with another radical, forming a spin‐paired molecule. The second reaction is between a radical and a spin‐paired molecule, generating a new radical and a new spin‐paired molecule. The third reaction is radical decomposition in a unimolecular reaction, forming a new radical and a spin‐paired...
2.1K
Radical Reactivity: Nucleophilic Radicals
2.1K
Radicals adjacent to electron-donating groups are called nucleophilic radicals. These radicals readily react with electrophilic alkenes. The SOMO–LUMO interactions are the driving force for the reaction, where the high-energy SOMO of the electron-rich, nucleophilic radicals interacts with the low-energy LUMO of the electron-deficient, electrophilic alkenes. Such SOMO–LUMO interactions are the basis of reactive radical traps, affecting the selectivity in radical reactions. For...
2.1K
Radical Formation: Addition
1.7K
Radicals can be formed by adding a radical to a spin-paired molecule. This is typically observed with unsaturated species, where the addition of a radical across the π bond leads to the production of a new radical by dissolving the π bond. For example, the addition of a Br radical to an alkene yields a carbon-centered radical.
Similar to charge conservation in chemical reactions, spin conservation is implicit for radical reactions. Accordingly, the product formed must possess an...
Similar to charge conservation in chemical reactions, spin conservation is implicit for radical reactions. Accordingly, the product formed must possess an...
1.7K
Radical Reactivity: Steric Effects
1.9K
The presence of electron-donating, electron-withdrawing, or conjugating groups adjacent to a radical center, imparts electronic stabilization to the radicals. Examples of such electronically-stabilized radicals are triphenylmethyl, tetramethylpiperidine‐N‐oxide, and 2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl. These radicals are remarkably stable and are known as persistent radicals. Some of the persistent radicals can even be isolated and purified.
Along with electronic...
Along with electronic...
1.9K
Radical Formation: Abstraction
3.5K
The electron of an atom can be abstracted from a compound by a relatively unstable radical to generate a new radical of relatively greater stability. For example, an initiator which forms radicals by homolysis can abstract a suitable species like a hydrogen atom or a halogen atom from a compound to generate a new radical. This ability of radicals to propagate by abstraction is a crucial feature of radical chain reactions.
Even though homolysis produces radicals, it is different from radical...
Even though homolysis produces radicals, it is different from radical...
3.5K


