阴谋主义,原教旨主义和极端主义的恶性解释
1Philosophy Department, Faculty of Religion & Theology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Review of philosophy and psychology
|June 26, 2023
概括
对于极端信仰和阴谋论等行为的恶性解释需要改进,而不是驳回. 经验证据支持将性格特征与情境因素相结合,以获得全面的理解.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 思想的哲学 思想的哲学
- 行为科学 行为科学
背景情况:
- 对阴谋主义,原教旨主义和极端主义的研究经常使用"恶性解释",专注于性格特征.
- 这些解释面临着"情境主义的挑战",质疑恶习的强度,强调情境的影响.
研究的目的:
- 批判性地检查局势主义者对极端信仰和行为的解释.
- 评估在心理学和哲学中围绕副解释的经验证据和论证.
主要方法:
- 审查和分析与局势主义挑战有关的经验证据.
- 对有关副解释与情境因素的论证的评估.
- 综合发现,得出关于副解释的有效性和应用的结论.
主要成果:
- 对极端行为和信念的恶性解释并没有被经验证据所毁,但需要细微的应用.
- 情境因素显著影响行为和信念,实验心理学证明了这一点.
- 需要采取平衡的方法,将缺点解释与情境考虑相结合.
结论:
- 阴谋主义,原教旨主义和极端主义的恶性解释需要改进,而不是放弃.
- 区分副解释与情境因素的适当应用至关重要.
- 将恶性解释与情境因素相结合,可以更全面地了解极端行为和信仰.
更多相关视频
05:22Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
5.4K
11:12Modulation of the Neurophysiological Response to Fearful and Stressful Stimuli Through Repetitive Religious Chanting
Published on: November 4, 2021
3.5K
相关概念视频
Group Polarization
34.4K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.4K
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
Confirmation Biases
5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
Groupthink
44.5K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.5K
Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation
378
Affiliation motivation is the intrinsic desire to connect with others and belong to a social group, which plays a crucial role in forming and maintaining personal relationships. This type of motivation is essential for psychological well-being, as it provides individuals with a sense of community and support. An example of this is a student who joins a study group in order to feel a sense of connection. People with high affiliation motivation actively seek social approval, take satisfaction in...
378
In- and Out-Groups
39.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.1K
