质量检查是新的常态:在线陪审团决策研究中的试验模式
Evelyn M Maeder1, Susan Yamamoto2, Logan Ewanation3
1Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
概括
书面试验成绩单比视频提供更可靠的在线数据. 虽然判决结果相似,但成绩单改善了数据质量检查和一些当事人的看法,但视频引起了白人被告的更多负面情绪.
科学领域:
- 法律心理学 法律心理学
- 陪审团研究方法论 陪审团研究方法论
- 在线研究有效性在线研究有效性
背景情况:
- 审判呈现方式 (视频与书面成绩单) 可以影响陪审团研究结果.
- 了解这些差异对于法律研究的内部和生态有效性至关重要.
- 在线研究平台对数据质量和参与者参与提出了独特的挑战.
研究的目的:
- 为了比较录像与书面审判材料的陪审团判决,当事人的看法和情绪反应.
- 评估模式对在线研究中的数据质量检查的影响.
- 通过不同的演示格式来调查种族问题的感知突出性.
主要方法:
- 通过亚马逊机械土耳其人招募的139名参与者被随机分配观看录像的试验或阅读书面成绩单.
- 参与者填写了关于判决,党派看法,种族突出性和情绪状态的问卷.
- 进行了质量检查,以评估参与者的注意力和对试验内容的理解.
主要成果:
- 在视频和转录条件之间,没有发现判决或感知种族突出性的显著差异.
- 观看成绩单的参与者在质量检查中表现明显好于观看视频的参与者.
- 截图观看者报告了对病理学家和警察的更积极的看法;视频观看者对白人被告表现出了更多的负面情绪.
结论:
- 虽然判决没有受到影响,但模式影响审判当事人的感知和情绪反应,突出了陪审团研究中的权衡.
- 书面成绩单似乎更有效地确保在线陪审团研究中的数据有效性.
- 研究人员必须实施强有力的质量检查,特别是在线研究,以确保参与者关注试验材料.
相关概念视频
Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.1K
Confirmation Biases
5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
Decision Making: P-value Method
5.5K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.5K
Decision Making
150
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
150
Experimental Designs
11.6K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
11.6K
Randomized Experiments
7.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.1K


