Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

1.4K
Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
1.4K
Translational Regulation01:29

Translational Regulation

45
Translational regulation in prokaryotes ensures efficient protein synthesis by controlling ribosome access to mRNA. This regulation is mediated by secondary RNA structures, including translational riboswitches, RNA thermometers, and small RNAs (sRNAs), which respond to intracellular and environmental signals to modulate gene expression.Translational RiboswitchesRiboswitches in the leader region of mRNAs can regulate translation by altering the accessibility of the Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence,...
45
Bioequivalence: Overview01:16

Bioequivalence: Overview

1.1K
Pharmaceutical equivalents, by definition, are drug products with the same active ingredient in the same quantities, encapsulated in identical dosage forms, and intended for the same administration routes. These pharmaceutical equivalents are deemed bioequivalent if the bioavailability of the active entity in the drug preparations is similar. Moreover, pharmaceutical equivalents demonstrating bioequivalence are also regarded as therapeutically equivalent. This means that when used as directed,...
1.1K
Leaky Scanning02:28

Leaky Scanning

5.2K
During most eukaryotic translation processes, the small 40S ribosome subunit scans an mRNA from its 5' end until it encounters the first start AUG codon. The large 60S ribosomal subunit then joins the smaller one to initiate protein synthesis. The location of the translation initiation is largely determined by the nucleotides near the start codon as there may be multiple translation initiation sites present on the mRNA.  Marilyn Kozak discovered that the sequence RCCAUGG (where R...
5.2K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.1K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.1K
Cotranslational Protein Translocation01:20

Cotranslational Protein Translocation

7.4K
Translocation of proteins across membranes is an ancient process that occurs even in bacteria and archaebacteria. In fact, the components of the translocation machinery are still conserved between prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
Sec61 channel partners for cotranslational translocation
During cotranslational translocation, the Sec61 channel partners with the signal recognition particle (SRP), the signal recognition particle receptor (SR), and the ribosomes to transport the nascent polypeptide chain...
7.4K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

The need for a global effort to attend to human neural organoid and assembloid research.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Will an Enhanced Child Have Less Freedom? A U.S. Nationally Representative Survey Experiment.

The Hastings Center report·2025
Same author

A Reset for Bioethics: A Statement from the Global Observatory for Genome Editing.

The CRISPR journal·2025
Same author

Religion v. Science? No and Yes.

The Hastings Center report·2025
Same author

Translational Bioethical Decision-Making: Human Brain Organoids as a Case Study.

Ethics & human research·2024
Same author

Scientism, trust, value alignment, views of nature, and U.S. public opinion about gene drive mosquitos.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2024

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.0K

翻译生物伦理学和公众投入

John H Evans1

  • 1Tata Chancellor's Chair of Social Science and a codirector of the Institute for Practical Ethics at the University of California, San Diego.

Ethics & human research
|June 27, 2023
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

翻译科学需要一种方法来确定公共利益. 本研究建议使用机构审查委员会 (IRB) 伦理学来确定生物技术创新的公共价值.

关键词:
公众参与,公众参与.公众的观点是公众的观点.社会科学和生物伦理学翻译性的生物伦理学翻译科学是翻译科学.

更多相关视频

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management
08:01

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management

Published on: November 30, 2022

4.4K
A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

17.9K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.0K
Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management
08:01

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management

Published on: November 30, 2022

4.4K
A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

17.9K

科学领域:

  • 生物技术伦理 生物技术伦理
  • 翻译科学科学政策政策
  • 社会科学研究方法社会科学研究方法

背景情况:

  • 翻译科学对公共利益至关重要,但缺乏定义公共利益的机制.
  • 传统的社会科学方法不足以凝聚公众对复杂生物技术的看法.
  • 现有的方法可能会带来不代表性数据或无法管理的信息量.

研究的目的:

  • 提出一种新的方法来评估翻译科学中的公共价值.
  • 弥合科学进步和公共利益之间的差距.
  • 为评估公众对生物技术创新的支持提供一个结构化的方法.

主要方法:

  • 调整机构审查委员会 (IRB) 的伦理框架.
  • 利用IRB的简化和结构化道德来生成社会科学报告.
  • 专注于确定关于特定生物技术的四到六个最突出的公共价值或原则.
  • 建立一个生物伦理委员会来权衡和平衡已识别的公共价值.

主要成果:

  • 拟议的方法提供了对社会科学数据的结构化方法,这些数据与翻译科学相关.
  • 它有助于将复杂的公众意见简化为可操作的见解.
  • 该框架允许明确确定公众对创新的支持.

结论:

  • IRB伦理模型可以适应评估翻译科学的公共价值观.
  • 生物伦理委员会可以有效地权衡确定的公共价值观,以衡量公众的支持.
  • 这种方法提供了一个可行的机制,使生物技术创新与公共利益保持一致.