Search research articles

关于 JoVE

概览领导团队博客 JoVE 帮助中心

作者

出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿

图书馆员

用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题

研究

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments 存档

教育

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual 教师资源中心教师网站

使用条款与条件

相关概念视频

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序

Same author

Data-Independent Acquisition-Based Quantitative Proteomics, Nontargeted Metabolomics, and Protein-Ligand Interaction Reveal the Mechanism of Baicalin Inhibiting β<i>-</i>hemolytic/cytolytic Activities of <i>Streptococcus agalactiae</i>.

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry·2026

Same author

Efficacy and safety of six immunoadsorption treatments for severe lupus nephritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review.

Frontiers in immunology·2026

Same author

A manganese metabolism-related gene signature for prognosis prediction and immune microenvironment description of glioblastoma.

Discover oncology·2026

Same author

Nutritional risk stratification management is associated with reduced disease relapse and improved quality of life in IBD patients: a retrospective study.

Frontiers in nutrition·2026

Same author

Effectiveness and safety of four drainage methods for lung abscess: a Bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review.

Frontiers in medicine·2026

Same author

Efficacy comparison of seven non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke: a Bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review.

Frontiers in neurology·2026

Search research articles

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 25, 2025

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

Published on: August 28, 2019

基于分析层次过程 (AHP) 的水生动物引入的风险评估模型系统.

Xuxin Zhang^1,2,3, Hehe Du^2,3, Zhouzhou Zhao^2,3

¹Sanya Nanfan Research Institute, Hainan University, Sanya 572022, China.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI

|June 28, 2023

概括

一个新的分析层次过程 (AHP) 模型提供了对水生入侵物种 (IS) 的定量风险评估. 该系统有效评估风险,有助于管理水生动物的引入,防止生态系统的破坏.

关键词:

分析层次过程 (AHP)水生生态系统水生生态系统这是生物入侵.引进的水生动物是引进的水生动物.侵入性物种 (IS) 是一种入侵性物种.风险评估风险评估风险评估

更多相关视频

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation

Published on: February 10, 2023

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 25, 2025

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

Published on: August 28, 2019

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation

Published on: February 10, 2023

科学领域:

生态生态学生态生态学
环境科学环境科学
风险评估风险评估

背景情况:

侵入性物种 (IS) 破坏生态系统和经济,需要强有力的风险评估协议.
目前的IS风险评估方法往往是定性或半定量的,缺少用于水生动物的系统.
现有的评估系统主要侧重于陆地动物,在水生物种评估中留下了一个空白.

研究的目的:

为水生入侵物种 (IS) 制定定量风险评估模型.
解决现有的定性/半定量方法的局限性和水生动物评估工具的稀缺性.
支持对引入和管理水生物种的知情决策.

主要方法:

开发一个分析层次过程 (AHP) 模型,包括四个初级,十二个二级和六十个三级索引.
在中国引入的五种不同的水生动物物种的定量风险评估中应用AHP模型.
基于生物特征和引入目的的比较风险评估.

主要成果:

AHP模型有效地对引入的水生动物进行了定量风险评估.
被评为高风险的Pterygoplichthys pardalis被认为是高风险的
马克罗布拉希乌姆·罗森伯格,Crassostrea gigas和Trachemys scripta elegans是中等风险的; 墨西哥是低风险的.

结论:

开发的AHP模型对于水生入侵物种的定量风险评估是有效的.
该模型为引入和可持续管理水生动物提供了至关重要的支持.
AHP模型为有关物种引入的风险管理决策提供了科学基础.