相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

研究生研究创新能力尺度 (PRIAS) 的构建和验证:基于创意成分理论的三维结构模型

Jia-Bin Xu¹, Meng Tian¹, Jing Wang¹

¹The School of Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China.

Psychology research and behavior management

|July 10, 2023

概括

一个新的尺度衡量研究生研究创新能力,确定三个关键因素:创造力过程,领域技能和动机. 这种经过验证的工具有助于未来的高等教育创新研究.

科学领域:

高等教育研究高等教育研究
心理测量心理测量心理测量
创造力研究创造力研究

背景情况:

评估研究生研究创新能力对于学术发展至关重要.
现有的措施可能无法充分捕捉到研究创新的多方面的性质.

研究的目的:

开发和验证研究生研究创新能力尺度.
探索研究生研究创新的基础结构.

主要方法:

通过文献审查,采访和讨论生成项目池.
在330名研究生数据上的探索性和确认性因子分析.
可靠性 (内部一致性,测试重试) 和有效性评估.

主要成果:

一个11项,3因素的规模出现,包括创造力相关的过程,领域相关的技能,和内在的动机.
该尺度表现出强大的心理测量特性:良好的内部一致性 (α=0.89) 和测试-重新测试可靠性 (r=0.86).
因子分析证实了一个强大的三因素模型,具有出色的合适指数 (例如,CFI=0.950,RMSEA=0.076).

结论:

研究生研究创新能力尺度是一个可靠和有效的工具.
这种尺度可以有效地用于未来研究研究生创新的研究.
结果有助于理解和促进高等教育的研究创新.

关键词:

研究生研究生研究生.可靠性的可靠性研究创新能力能力的有效性有效性.

更多相关视频

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

相关概念视频

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.