工会总是成为力量吗? 群体地位和重新分类会影响潜在的联盟集团的物理可怕性
Alexandra Vázquez1,2, John F Dovidio3, Ángel Gómez1,2
1Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, Spain.
The British journal of social psychology
|July 10, 2023
概括
群体地位和社会身份影响对联盟力量的看法. 较高或相似地位的群体增强了感知中的可怕性,而与较低地位的群体共享的身份也提高了联盟的力量.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 进化心理学 进化心理学
- 政治科学 政治科学是指政治学.
背景情况:
- 联盟提供了进化优势,在现代社会中至关重要.
- 评估盟友包括评估他们对联盟所感知的物理可怕性的贡献.
- 之前的研究主要集中在个人或集团内部的联盟.
研究的目的:
- 调查群体特质,特别是地位和群体间关系,如何影响群体间联盟的可怕性.
- 检查社会认同过程和融合在估计联盟可怕性的作用.
主要方法:
- 进行了三项研究,重点关注集团间联盟,以欧盟 (EU) 为案例研究.
- 研究1操纵了联盟伙伴的地位.
- 研究2和研究3探讨了重新分类和共同群体认同对感知可怕性的影响,而研究3检查了通过融合调解.
主要成果:
- 包括更高或类似地位的群体增加了欧盟的可怕性.
- 在一个共同的群体身份中重新分类一个低地位的群体,增强了欧盟的可怕性.
- 与外组成员的融合调解了社会身份过程对感知可怕性的影响.
结论:
- 无论是群体地位还是社会身份的过程都对估计联盟的可靠性有很大影响.
- 这些发现扩大了我们对跨集团联盟动态和联盟形成的理解.
- 聚合成为一个关键的,未被充分探索的机制,在集团间联盟的感知.
相关概念视频
In- and Out-Groups
39.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.1K
Group Polarization
34.4K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.4K
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Relationship Formation
40.1K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.1K
Stereotype Content Model
14.8K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.8K
Groupthink
44.5K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.5K


