信心反应时间:挑战决策后的信心模型
Sixing Chen1,2, Dobromir Rahnev3,4
1School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Journal of vision
|July 14, 2023
概括
信任响应时间 (cRT) 与信任水平没有内在联系. 相反,信任评级的速度取决于具体评级的频率,挑战现有的模型.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 神经科学是一个神经科学.
- 决策 决策 决策 决策
背景情况:
- 信任计算得到了广泛的研究,但信任响应时间 (cRTs) 的作用较少被理解.
- 以前的研究表明cRTs和信心之间存在负相关性,支持后决策模型.
- 这些模型预测所有个体的信心和cRT之间存在一致的负关系.
研究的目的:
- 调查cRT是否与信心密切相关,还是受响应频率驱动.
- 测试一个替代假设,即更快的响应与最频繁的信任评级有关,无论它们的水平如何.
- 挑战现有的决策后信心模型.
主要方法:
- 从信任数据库中分析了三大数据集.
- 检查信心评级与相应的响应时间 (cRTs) 之间的关系.
- 调查决策响应时间和cRTs之间的跨学科相关性.
主要成果:
- 对于最频繁给予的信任评级,观察到最低的cRTs.
- 报告高信心的个体最频繁地显示出负的信心-cRT关系.
- 报告信心较低的个体最频繁地显示出一种积极的信心-cRT关系.
- 在决策响应时间和cRT之间发现了显著的相关性,这表明了共同的影响因素.
结论:
- 信任响应时间 (cRT) 并与信任水平本质上无关.
- 特定信任评级的频率显著影响响应速度.
- 这些发现挑战了后决策模型的普遍性,这些模型预测信心和cRTs之间的持续负相关性.
更多相关视频
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
770
13:00Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
9.9K
相关概念视频
Reason and Intuition
6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K
Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.1K
Decision Making
146
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
146
Decision Making: P-value Method
5.5K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.5K
Confirmation Biases
5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
Hindsight Biases
3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
3.4K
