冲突范式不能揭示能力
1Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA roman_feiman@brown.eduhttps://sites.brown.edu/bltlab/.
The Behavioral and brain sciences
|July 18, 2023
概括
双流程理论面临着关于其独家性假设的批评. 研究中使用的冲突范式可能无法准确地揭示个体认知过程如何独立运作.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 双流程理论 双流程理论
背景情况:
- 双过程理论提出了不同的认知系统.
- 这些理论中的排他性假设表明,一个过程排除了另一个过程.
- 对这一假设的有效性提出了批评.
研究的目的:
- 批判性地评估双流程理论中的排他性假设.
- 识别用于研究认知过程的当前研究范式的局限性.
主要方法:
- 分析现有的双流程理论及其基础假设.
- 检查冲突范式及其推断能力.
主要成果:
- 双流程理论中的排他性假设从根本上是有缺陷的.
- 冲突范式为认知过程的独立运作提供了有限的见解.
结论:
- 独家性假设需要在双重流程框架内重新评估.
- 可能需要使用替代研究方法来更好地理解个人的认知过程.
相关概念视频
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
90
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
90
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Stereotype Content Model
14.8K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.8K
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
115
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
115
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
121
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
121
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
5.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.2K


