使用推理的研究来解决不合理的时代
1Centre for Science and Policy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK m.osman@jbs.ac.ukhttps://magdaosman.com.
The Behavioral and brain sciences
|July 18, 2023
概括
重新思考推理理论可以帮助解决社会,政治和文化挑战. 这项工作建议推进基于德尼斯的应用推理研究计划.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
背景情况:
- 社会,政治和文化挑战需要重新评估推理理论.
- 现有的推理理论可能无法完全捕捉现实世界决策的复杂性.
- 需要一个应用研究计划来弥合理论理解和实际应用.
研究的目的:
- 为推进应用推理研究计划提出论证.
- 建立在德尼斯关于推理的基础工作上.
- 探索如何精细推理理论可以解决当代社会挑战.
主要方法:
- 该研究提出了一个应用推理研究计划的概念框架.
- 它涉及到对现有的推理理论进行批判性审查和综合.
- 该方法强调在推理中整合认知和社会因素.
主要成果:
- 拟议的框架为推理理论的应用提供了一个新的视角.
- 它强调了跨学科方法的潜力,以提高对推理的理解.
- 这项工作表明,德尼斯的研究为应用研究提供了有价值的起点.
结论:
- 重新思考推理理论对于解决复杂的社会问题至关重要.
- 一个应用推理研究计划可以提供实际的见解和解决方案.
- 需要进一步的研究来开发和测试在现实世界的背景下提出的框架.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Reasoning
105
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
105
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
63
A revisionist approach to Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has brought new insights that challenge and reinterpret his established ideas. Piaget proposed that the formal operational stage, emerging in adolescence, represents the culmination of cognitive maturity. During this stage, individuals are said to develop abstract thinking, engage in systematic problem-solving, and show a form of egocentrism, believing others are as preoccupied with their behavior as they are...
63
Reason and Intuition
6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K
Inductive Reasoning
60.6K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.6K
Piaget's Stage 4 of Cognitive Development
94
The formal operational stage, as described in Piaget's cognitive development theory, begins around age 11 and extends into adulthood. It marks the emergence of advanced cognitive abilities that differentiate adolescent and adult thinking from those of younger children. This stage is characterized by abstract reasoning, hypothetical-deductive reasoning, and a more complex understanding of self and others.
Abstract Reasoning and Hypothetical-Deductive Thinking
Unlike the concrete operational...
Abstract Reasoning and Hypothetical-Deductive Thinking
Unlike the concrete operational...
94
Deductive Reasoning
55.7K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
55.7K


