是否残疾人工资差距是一种性别不平等? 来自挪威一项为期13年的全人口研究的证据
1NIFU Nordic Institute for Studies of Innovation, Research and Education, PO Box 2815, Tøyen, 0608, Oslo, Norway.
Social science & medicine (1982)
|July 22, 2023
概括
残疾人面临着持续的工资差距,残疾女性遭受的收入处罚最为严重. 这凸显了尽管有立法,但劳动力市场的不公正仍在继续.
科学领域:
- 社会经济学 社会经济学
- 劳动经济学 劳动经济学
- 性别研究是性别研究.
背景情况:
- 现有的研究证实了残疾人的就业劣势.
- 残疾和性别工资差距的交叉仍然未被充分探索.
- 了解这些交叉点对于解决劳动力市场不平等至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 调查导致残疾人工资差距的因素.
- 分析随着时间的推移,无法解释的残疾人工资差距的演变.
- 检查性别如何与残疾相交,以影响工资处罚.
主要方法:
- 利用挪威全国年度注册数据从2005年至2017年 (N=850万).
- 采用纵向分析来估计与非残疾工人相比,残疾男女的工资差距.
- 专注于剩余的工资差距,以确定无法解释的收入差异.
主要成果:
- 确定了残疾员工持续存在的剩余工资差距.
- 性别被证实是收入的重要预测因素.
- 残疾妇女面临着特别严重的工资劣势.
结论:
- 交叉理论对于理解复合缺点至关重要.
- 反歧视立法还没有完全成功地消除残疾人的劳动力市场不公正.
- 需要进一步的政策干预,以解决残疾妇女面临的复合工资处罚.
更多相关视频
03:35Determining Gender-Based Differences in Retinal and Choroidal Thickness in Underweight Individuals via Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: December 1, 2023
335
09:07Protocol for Studying Extinction of Conditioned Fear in Naturally Cycling Female Rats
Published on: February 23, 2015
13.5K
相关概念视频
Two-Way ANOVA
2.7K
The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
2.7K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.3K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.3K
Stereotype Content Model
14.8K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.8K
Regression Toward the Mean
6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Learning Disabilities
219
Learning disabilities are cognitive disorders caused by neurological impairments that affect cognitive functions like language and reading, without indicating overall intellectual or developmental challenges. These disabilities differ from global intellectual or developmental disabilities as they are limited to distinct cognitive functions. Common learning disabilities include dysgraphia, dyslexia, and dyscalculia, each of which impacts unique aspects of learning.
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
219
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
361
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
361
