饮食风险评分 (DRS) 对华裔美国成年人的相对有效性
Emily A Johnston1, Agnes Park1, Lu Hu2
1Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
BMJ nutrition, prevention & health
|July 24, 2023
概括
饮食风险评分 (DRS) 在华裔美国成年人中显示出相对有效性,与健康饮食指数 (HEI) -2015分数相反相关. 这种工具可以帮助识别患心脏代谢疾病风险的个体.
科学领域:
- 营养流行病学 营养流行病学
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 饮食评估 饮食评估
背景情况:
- 准确的饮食评估对于了解不同人群的健康风险至关重要.
- 九项饮食风险评分 (DRS) 是评估饮食习惯的一种工具.
- 成年华裔美国人有独特的饮食模式,需要文化相关的评估方法.
研究的目的:
- 评估中国裔美国成年人9项饮食风险评分 (DRS) 的相对有效性.
- 评估自动自主24小时饮食评估工具 (ASA24) 对这一群体的有用性.
- 在COVID-19大流行期间记录参与者招募的挑战.
主要方法:
- 33名华裔美国成年人通过ASA24完成了DRS和两个24小时的饮食回忆.
- 健康饮食指数 (HEI) -2015的得分是根据饮食回忆计算的.
- 使用斯皮尔曼相关性来比较DRS和HEI-2015分数.
主要成果:
- 在DRS和HEI-2015分数之间发现了显著的反相关性 (r=-0.43,p<0.05).
- 在蔬菜和鱼类等特定成分之间观察到最强的相关性.
- 由于COVID-19的限制,参与者招募受到阻碍,这影响了不太文化的人的纳入.
- ASA24数据库在捕获文化特定食品方面存在局限性.
结论:
- DRS证明了相对有效性和潜在的实用性,用于识别有心脏代谢疾病风险的华裔美国人.
- 医生可以在临床实践中使用DRS作为查工具.
- 在饮食评估和招募方面的方法挑战被确定为未来的研究.
关键词:
营养评估 营养评估 营养评估
相关概念视频
01:25Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
42
Calcium-Scoring CT ScanA calcium-scoring CT scan, also known as coronary artery calcium (CAC) scan, detects calcium deposits in the coronary arteries. This test assesses the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), which can lead to cardiovascular events such as angina, heart failure, and sudden cardiac arrest.A calcium-scoring CT scan is generally recommended for individuals at intermediate risk of CAD without symptoms. It includes:Men aged 40-75 and women aged 50-75: Especially those with a...
42
01:12Relative Risk
224
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
224
01:29Bias in Epidemiological Studies
361
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
361