埃塞俄比亚北部乙型肝炎病毒感染的危险因素:个案对照研究
Desalegn Weldebrhan1, Hailemariam Berhe2, Yohannes Tesfay2
1Department of Adult Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mekelle University, Tigray, Ethiopia.
Hepatic medicine : evidence and research
|July 25, 2023
概括
家庭性肝炎暴露,传统医疗程序和牙科工作是埃塞俄比亚北部乙型肝炎病毒 (HBV) 感染的关键风险因素. 提高对性传播的认识可能会降低HBV风险.
科学领域:
- 肝病学 肝病学是一种肝病学.
- 传染性疾病 传染性疾病
- 流行病学 流行病学
背景情况:
- 乙型肝炎病毒 (HBV) 感染对全球健康构成重大挑战,导致肝病发病率和死亡率.
- 尽管儿童接种疫苗很普遍,但埃塞俄比亚已经观察到与HBV相关的住院病例和死亡率的上升.
- 埃塞俄比亚北部对HBV风险因素的流行病学数据有限,需要有针对性的研究.
研究的目的:
- 调查和确定与乙型肝炎病毒感染相关的特定风险因素.
- 为埃塞俄比亚北部公共卫生干预提供关键的流行病学数据.
主要方法:
- 一项无与伦比的医院病例控制研究于2019年3月至5月进行.
- 从213名参与者 (71个病例,142个对照组) 收集数据,通过使用预先测试的问卷进行面对面采访.
- 统计分析涉及二进制和多变量逻辑回归,显著性设置为P <0.05.
主要成果:
- 家庭暴露于肝炎 (AOR 3.7) 和牙科手术史 (AOR 3.8) 与增加的HBV风险显著相关.
- 之前的传统医疗程序 (AOR 1.2) 也成为一个风险因素.
- 意识到HBV是一种性传播感染与感染的可能性较低有关 (AOR 0.084).
结论:
- 家庭中与肝炎的接触,牙科病史和之前的传统医疗程序被确定为HBV感染的独立风险因素.
- 缺乏对性传播HBV的认识是导致感染率的关键因素.
- 研究结果强调需要针对性公共卫生战略,以解决埃塞俄比亚北部这些特定的风险因素.
相关概念视频
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
12.0K
The hosts' susceptibility to infection depends on several factors. The integrity of the skin and mucous membranes helps protect the body against microbial attacks. When the skin is altered, the chance of infection, limb loss, and even death increases.
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
12.0K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
356
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
356


