当焦点和愿景成为梦时:底线思维气候,共同的愿景和单位不道德的行为
Christian J Resick1, Lorenzo Lucianetti2, Mary B Mawritz1
1Management Department, LeBow College of Business, Drexel University.
The Journal of applied psychology
|July 27, 2023
概括
专注于财务结果的领导者可能会培养不道德的行为,特别是当一个共同的愿景引导员工实现底线目标时. 这项研究揭示了共同愿景的黑暗面,当利是唯一的优先事项时,激励不当行为.
科学领域:
- 组织行为 组织行为
- 商业道德 商业道德
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
背景情况:
- 目标屏蔽理论解释了个人如何优先考虑目标.
- 底线思维气候和共同的愿景影响集体行为.
- 追求财务成果时的不道德行为是一个重要的组织问题.
研究的目的:
- 检查底线思维气候和共同视野对集体不道德行为的影响.
- 为了研究底线思维的领导者如何塑造单位气候.
- 了解共享愿景在非道德的亲组织行为中的调节作用.
主要方法:
- 在意大利,对96个工作单位进行了两波多行业实地研究.
- 数据收集包括评估领导者的底线思维,单位气候,共同的愿景和不道德的行为.
- 使用统计分析来测试假设关系.
主要成果:
- 具有底线思维的领导人成功地在他们的单位内培养了这种气候.
- 底线思维气候与不道德行为之间的关系取决于单位的共同愿景.
- 共享视野放大了对轻微不道德行为的影响 (例如,隐错误),对更严重的不当行为 (例如,) 至关重要.
结论:
- 共同的愿景可以通过引导激励资源向不道德的底线优先事项产生不利影响.
- 组织必须对如何实现共享愿景保持谨慎,特别是在以利为导向的环境中.
- 了解领导力,气候,愿景和道德之间的相互作用对于防止组织不当行为至关重要.
更多相关视频
06:18The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
2.1K
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11.7K
相关概念视频
Obedience
32.9K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
32.9K
Groupthink
44.5K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.5K
Ethics and Bioethics
1.4K
Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
1.4K
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse II
731
Professional accountability in nursing is a multifaceted concept that encompasses professional ethics, legal standards, and employment expectations. This framework ensures that nurses maintain and elevate the quality of care while upholding the values of their profession. It compels them to treat patients, families, and colleagues with respect, compassion, and integrity.
For example, a nurse demonstrating respect and compassion might listen attentively to a patient's concerns, provide...
For example, a nurse demonstrating respect and compassion might listen attentively to a patient's concerns, provide...
731
Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
