Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

119
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
119
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory01:20

Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory

287
Cognitive psychologist Richard Lazarus proposed the cognitive-mediational theory of emotions, which emphasizes how individuals' assessments of stressors significantly affect their experience of stress. According to Lazarus, the stress response is determined by a two-step appraisal process: primary appraisal and secondary appraisal. These cognitive appraisals help individuals evaluate the potential impact of a stressor and determine the adequacy of their coping resources.
Primary Appraisal:...
287
Bias01:22

Bias

4.3K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
4.3K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

32.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
32.0K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.2K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Diversion and Deviation: How Distracting Contextual Factors Amplify Cognitive Biases in Clinical Reasoning.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same author

Training climate matters: programmatic openness, individual belonging, and trainee mistreatment in graduate medical education.

Medical education online·2026
Same author

Effortful Knowing in the Age of Generative AI: Epistemology, Uncertainty and the Art of Medical Education.

The clinical teacher·2026
Same author

Social accountability and the social determinants of rural medical career choice: Is a smorgasbord approach ethical?

Medical education·2026
Same author

Enhancing Temporomandibular Disorders Education for Postgraduate Year-1 Dental Residents Through Multimedia Learning Theory.

Journal of dental education·2026
Same author

Learning to manage: a qualitative exploration of how graduate medical trainees develop management reasoning.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.7K

评估中的公平性:识别复杂的适应性系统

Nyoli Valentine1, Steven J Durning2, Ernst Michael Shanahan3

  • 1Prideaux Discipline of Clinical Education, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.

Perspectives on medical education
|July 31, 2023
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

卫生专业的公平判断教育评估是复杂的和适应性的,受到环境,系统和个人层面的相互作用的影响. 了解这些相互作用是设计有效评估策略的关键.

更多相关视频

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.5K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

758

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.7K
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.5K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

758

科学领域:

  • 健康 专业 教育 卫生 专业 教育
  • 评估设计 评估设计
  • 教育心理学教育心理学

背景情况:

  • 卫生专业教育中的评估设计正在发展.
  • 越来越多地强调将人类判断纳入评估中.
  • 了解公平判断的特征至关重要.

研究的目的:

  • 探索评估领导者如何在健康专业教育中概念化公正判断的特征.
  • 基于现有的关于评估公平性的文献.

主要方法:

  • 在线聚焦小组与来自澳大利亚和新西兰15所医学院的16名评估领导者进行了在线聚焦小组.
  • 数据收集和分析是同时和代地使用常量比较方法进行的.
  • 作为基础,使用了现有的公平判断的概念模型.

主要成果:

  • 评估中的公平性是一个多维构造,在环境,系统和个人层面上运作.
  • 关键组成部分包括明确的学习成果,支持性文化,利益相关者代理,证据解释,程序策略和评估人员专业知识.
  • 公平判断表现出碎形模式,表明它作为一个复杂的适应性系统而起作用.

结论:

  • 评估中的公平判断应该被视为一个复杂的适应系统,强调组件之间的相互作用,而不是孤立的元素.
  • 这种观点对设计评估计划和利用人类判断有重大影响.
  • 通过复杂性镜头重新思考评估公平性对于未来的做法至关重要.