在演性推理中为违约干预和并行账户做出贡献. 决策风格对逻辑和信念的影响
Rosa Angela Fabio1, Dalila Verzì1, Amelia Gangemi1
1University of Messina.
The Journal of general psychology
|August 1, 2023
概括
当逻辑和信念发生冲突时,两种推理系统都会出现错误. 理性决策者倾向于逻辑,而直观的人倾向于相信演推理任务.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 决策科学 决策科学 决策科学
背景情况:
- 经典推理理论将系统1与偏见,系统2与准确性联系起来.
- 精细的理论提出了双过程推理的并行模型.
研究的目的:
- 调查逻辑-信念冲突如何影响推理准确性和响应时间.
- 探索决策风格与演推理表现之间的关系.
主要方法:
- 72名参与者完成了64个逻辑推理任务 (modus ponens和modus tollens).
- 在逻辑和信念判断相冲突的条件下评估绩效.
主要成果:
- 逻辑和信念之间的冲突增加了响应错误和/或时间,无论是简单的和复杂的语法.
- 理性决策者优先考虑逻辑而不是信念.
- 直观的决策者优先考虑信念而不是逻辑.
结论:
- 支持双流程推理模型,显示冲突影响两个系统.
- 决策风格显著减轻了逻辑的影响,而不是对推理的信念.
更多相关视频
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
758
06:45Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
6.2K
相关概念视频
Deductive Reasoning
55.5K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
55.5K
Reasoning
102
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
102
Inductive Reasoning
60.6K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.6K
Decision Making
143
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
143
Reason and Intuition
6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
63
A revisionist approach to Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has brought new insights that challenge and reinterpret his established ideas. Piaget proposed that the formal operational stage, emerging in adolescence, represents the culmination of cognitive maturity. During this stage, individuals are said to develop abstract thinking, engage in systematic problem-solving, and show a form of egocentrism, believing others are as preoccupied with their behavior as they are...
63
