Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

1.7K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
1.7K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.2K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.2K
What Are Outliers?01:12

What Are Outliers?

3.9K
Outliers are observed data points that are far from the least squares line. They have unusual values and need to be examined carefully. Though an outlier may result from erroneous data, at other times, it may hold valuable information about the population under study and should be included in the data. Hence, it is crucial to examine what causes a data point to be an outlier.
The z score is used to find outliers or unusual values. It should be noted that any values beyond -2 and +2 are...
3.9K
Outliers and Influential Points01:08

Outliers and Influential Points

4.1K
An outlier is an observation of data that does not fit the rest of the data. It is sometimes called an extreme value. When you graph an outlier, it will appear not to fit the pattern of the graph. Some outliers are due to mistakes (for example, writing down 50 instead of 500), while others may indicate that something unusual is happening. Outliers are present far from the least squares line in the vertical direction. They have large "errors," where the "error" or residual is the...
4.1K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

240
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
240
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

7.6K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
7.6K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Effect of icosapent ethyl treatment on colorectal tissue marine omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid levels among patients with a history of adenoma: a prospective, single-arm clinical trial.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
Same author

A multi-state survival model to identify risk factors for lethal ovarian cancer.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2026
Same author

Associations of alcohol use with expression of stromal markers in benign breast biopsy samples.

British journal of cancer·2026
Same author

Reliability of stromal markers multiplex immunofluorescent staining: pathologist assessment compared to quantitative image analysis.

American journal of cancer research·2026
Same author

Associations of oral contraceptives with expression of CD44, CD24, and ALDH1A1 stem cell markers in women with benign breast biopsies.

Breast cancer research : BCR·2026
Same author

Non-medical drivers of health and imaging patterns in intimate partner violence.

Emergency radiology·2026
Same journal

Methods for incorporating test result information within the high-dimensional propensity score framework: application in UK electronic health record data.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Sparse multi-way DMDC for longitudinal classification in high dimension low sample size data.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Tree-based exploratory identification of predictive biomarkers in non-randomized data.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Comparative evaluation of interrupted time series analytical methods for healthcare quality improvement research: a Monte Carlo simulation study.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Methodological advances in claims-based dementia algorithms: integrating medication and clinical data for medicare populations.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

An interpretable XGboost algorithm for predicting 30-day mortality in acute pancreatitis using routine biomarkers.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 20, 2025

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
00:08

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.1K

检测异常值评估者的分析方法

Yujie Wu1, Sharon Curhan2,3, Bernard Rosner1,2

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Harvard University, Boston, USA.

BMC medical research methodology
|August 1, 2023
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

一个新的两阶段算法有效地识别了流行病学研究中的异常评估者,提高了数据质量. 这种方法可以准确地检测不一致的评估,减少偏见并提高研究结果的可靠性.

关键词:
评价员 评价员是一个评价员.错误发现率 错误发现率异常值检测异常值的检测质量控制 质量控制评审员 评审员 评审员

更多相关视频

Denver Papillae Protocol for Objective Analysis of Fungiform Papillae
10:50

Denver Papillae Protocol for Objective Analysis of Fungiform Papillae

Published on: June 8, 2015

14.4K
Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios
06:02

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios

Published on: October 6, 2020

2.3K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 20, 2025

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
00:08

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.1K
Denver Papillae Protocol for Objective Analysis of Fungiform Papillae
10:50

Denver Papillae Protocol for Objective Analysis of Fungiform Papillae

Published on: June 8, 2015

14.4K
Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios
06:02

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios

Published on: October 6, 2020

2.3K

科学领域:

  • 流行病学 流行病学
  • 生物统计学 生物统计学
  • 数据质量保证 数据质量保证

背景情况:

  • 流行病学研究依赖于评估者对数据质量的测量,而异常值可能会影响数据质量.
  • 测量误差调整的现有统计方法通常依赖于无法验证的假设,可能导致结果偏差.
  • 需要在数据收集过程中检测异常评估者的方法,以提高整体数据完整性.

研究的目的:

  • 提出和评估一种新的两阶段算法,用于检测观察性研究中的异常评估者.
  • 提高评估人员在大型健康研究中收集的数据的可靠性.
  • 提供灵活的方法来提高数据质量在源头.

主要方法:

  • 开发了一个两阶段的算法:第一阶段适合回归模型来估计评估者效应,第二阶段使用假设测试来识别异常值.
  • 该方法考虑了个别测试的统计能力和所有测试中的错误发现率 (FDR).
  • 该算法通过一项广泛的模拟研究进行了评估,并使用听力保护研究的数据进行了证明.

主要成果:

  • 模拟研究证实了算法的准确检测真异常值评估者的能力.
  • 与其他方法相比,提出的方法显示,与其他方法相比,错误标记有效的"正常"评估者的倾向较低.
  • 听力保护研究的申请成功识别了潜在的异常听力学家.

结论:

  • 开发的两阶段异常值检测算法提供了一种灵活有效的方法来识别具有始终高或低测量的评估者.
  • 实施这种算法可以在流行病学研究的数据收集阶段显著提高数据质量.
  • 这种方法有助于更可靠地估计健康研究中暴露和结果之间的关联.