死亡多元主义:一个提案
Gonzalo Díaz-Cobacho1, Alberto Molina-Pérez2, David Rodríguez-Arias3
1Department of Philosophy I, University of Granada, Granada, Spain. gdc@ugr.es.
Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM
|August 1, 2023
概括
确定死亡是复杂的,对脑死亡标准的反对意见日益增加. 这篇论文介绍了"弱多元主义",一种新的伦理方法来尊重对死亡决定的不同信仰.
科学领域:
- 医学伦理 医学伦理
- 法律医学是法律医学.
- 医学哲学 医学哲学
背景情况:
- 50多年来,关于死亡的决定一直在争论.
- 越来越多的家庭对脑死亡诊断的反对,引发了新的法律和伦理考虑.
- 对脑死亡标准的学术批评引发了持续的辩论.
研究的目的:
- 检查目前和拟议的方法来确定死亡.
- 解决死亡确定方面的伦理和政治挑战.
- 提出"弱多元主义"作为尊重死亡决定多样性的框架.
主要方法:
- 对确定死亡的理论和实践方法的审查.
- 对当前标准提出的伦理和法律异议的分析.
- "弱多元主义"概念的发展.
主要成果:
- 现有的死亡确定方法面临着重大的伦理和实际挑战.
- 越来越需要适应不同信仰的方法.
- "弱多元主义"提供了一种潜在的解决方案,以应对这些复杂性.
结论:
- 脑死亡的概念日益受到争议.
- 尊重对死亡决定的不同信仰是道德上的必需品.
- "弱多元主义"为道德和政治共识提供了一个可行的框架.
更多相关视频
09:27Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
Published on: October 13, 2018
10.1K
05:22Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
5.4K
相关概念视频
Group Polarization
34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
8.3K
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
8.3K
Radical Formation: Abstraction
3.5K
The electron of an atom can be abstracted from a compound by a relatively unstable radical to generate a new radical of relatively greater stability. For example, an initiator which forms radicals by homolysis can abstract a suitable species like a hydrogen atom or a halogen atom from a compound to generate a new radical. This ability of radicals to propagate by abstraction is a crucial feature of radical chain reactions.
Even though homolysis produces radicals, it is different from radical...
Even though homolysis produces radicals, it is different from radical...
3.5K
Radical Formation: Elimination
1.7K
Another method of radical formation is the elimination process. It is the opposite of the addition route and is driven by the instability of the radical. For example, as depicted in Figure 1, dibenzoyl peroxide yields a pair of unstable radicals upon homolysis. Given its instability, this radical spontaneously undergoes elimination via a C–C bond cleavage to form a relatively more stable phenyl radical. The mechanism involves cleavage of the bond between the α and β positions...
1.7K
Radical Formation: Addition
1.7K
Radicals can be formed by adding a radical to a spin-paired molecule. This is typically observed with unsaturated species, where the addition of a radical across the π bond leads to the production of a new radical by dissolving the π bond. For example, the addition of a Br radical to an alkene yields a carbon-centered radical.
Similar to charge conservation in chemical reactions, spin conservation is implicit for radical reactions. Accordingly, the product formed must possess an...
Similar to charge conservation in chemical reactions, spin conservation is implicit for radical reactions. Accordingly, the product formed must possess an...
1.7K
Law of Segregation
66.2K
When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.
66.2K
