丹佛发育查测试 (丹佛-II) 的预测有效性,用于检测早产儿发育协调障碍的风险
Isabella Saraiva Christovão1, Danielle Aparecida Gomes Pereira1, Lívia de Castro Magalhães1
1Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, School of Physical Education, Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Early human development
|August 2, 2023
概括
丹佛发育查测试 (DDST) 在预测2至4岁早产儿发育协调障碍 (DCD) 风险方面表现相当准确. 使用DDST的早期查可以帮助识别儿童在儿童时期晚些时候患DDS的风险.
科学领域:
- 发育儿科 发育儿科
- 神经发育障碍 神经发育障碍
- 选工具 验证 验证
背景情况:
- 丹佛II是一个常见的查工具,用于发育迟缓.
- 它对早产儿发育协调障碍 (DCD) 的预测有效性尚未研究.
研究的目的:
- 评估丹佛-II在预测早产婴儿DCD风险方面的准确性.
- 在这个人群中确定丹佛-II对DCD的预测有效性.
主要方法:
- 一项涉及121名早产儿的方法研究.
- 丹佛-II评估在1,2,3,4,或5岁;儿童运动评估电池 (MABC-2) 在7岁.
- 使用了单变量逻辑回归和ROC曲线分析.
主要成果:
- 在2,3,4岁时的丹佛-II"嫌疑人"分类增加了DCD风险 (MABC-2) 的可能性分别为3.45,7.40和6.06倍 (p <0.05).
- 接收器操作特征 (ROC) 曲线分析表明,对于2 (0.60),3 (0.61) 和4 (0.64) 岁的年龄来说,准确度相当高.
- 随着时间的推移,丹佛-II的累积"嫌疑人"地位与增加的DCD风险概率显著相关 (p < 0.001).
结论:
- 丹佛-II在2至4岁之间给予早产儿时,在学校年龄区分DCD风险方面表现出相当的准确性.
- 使用丹佛-II的全球发育查可以帮助在早产人群中早期识别DCD风险.
更多相关视频
19:15Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
86.1K
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
5.8K
相关概念视频
01:30Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
131
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by persistent inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. It affects approximately 5-8% of children globally, with around 60-70% of cases persisting into adulthood. ADHD has significant implications for educational attainment, social interactions, and occupational success.
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
131
01:29Reliability and Validity
12.8K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.8K